2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General versus specific achievement goals: A re-examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance-approach goals are predicted only by self-effi cacy (which is a motivational belief's component), and in turn, they predict academic performance. Contrary to some previous research on goal orientation (Sparfeldt et al, 2015;Mouratidis et al, 2013), our results indicated that performance-approach goals (not mastery-approach goals) predict academic performance. These fi ndings are in line with Wolters' results (2004), but contradict those which emphasized that a small amount of variance in academic performance is explained by achievement goals alone (Huang, 2013), especially by the performance goals (Hulleman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Performance-approach goals are predicted only by self-effi cacy (which is a motivational belief's component), and in turn, they predict academic performance. Contrary to some previous research on goal orientation (Sparfeldt et al, 2015;Mouratidis et al, 2013), our results indicated that performance-approach goals (not mastery-approach goals) predict academic performance. These fi ndings are in line with Wolters' results (2004), but contradict those which emphasized that a small amount of variance in academic performance is explained by achievement goals alone (Huang, 2013), especially by the performance goals (Hulleman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Credé and Phillips (2011) showed that motivational beliefs and learning strategies are more class-specifi c and may vary across classes for the same individual. Also, the latest studies showed that general goals are relevant for general academic outcomes, while specifi c achievement goals are more relevant for specifi c academic performance (Sparfeldt et al, 2015). Therefore, assessing these variables over diff erent classes, we tried to grasp a general tendency regarding them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, as knowledge about the context specificity of achievement goal theory is rather underdeveloped (for exceptions, see e.g., Bong 2004;Sparfeldt et al 2015 for explorations of students' achievement goals in different subjects; for a study on mastery goal structures and their link to achievement goals in mathematics and German, see ), a further contribution of this study lies in the investigation of the link between mastery goal structures, motivational outcomes, and practical relevance in a range of subjects. We include five subjects, two that are specific to vocational education (accounting, business administration) and three that are covered in all Austrian secondary schools (English, German, and mathematics).…”
Section: Practical Relevance As Potential Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sparfeldt et al (2015), 'achievement goals are related to the intention or motivational purpose to engage in particular tasks ' (p. 170). A classic distinction in achievement goal theory is between mastery goals and performance goals (Dweck 1986;Nicholls 1984).…”
Section: Intentional Learning and Achievement Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%