2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General trilinear interaction for arbitrary even higher spin gauge fields

Abstract: Using Noether's procedure we present a complete solution for the trilinear interactions of arbitrary spins s 1 , s 2 , s 3 in a flat background, and discuss the possibility to enlarge this construction to higher order interactions in the gauge field. Some classification theorems of the cubic (self)interaction with different numbers of derivatives and depending on relations between the spins are presented. Finally the expansion of a general spin s gauge transformation into powers of the field and the related cl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
174
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(52 reference statements)
6
174
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[37,38], while, in metric-like approach, in refs. [39][40][41]. In BRST approach, cubic vertices involving arbitrary spin massless and massive fields were derived in ref.…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)197mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37,38], while, in metric-like approach, in refs. [39][40][41]. In BRST approach, cubic vertices involving arbitrary spin massless and massive fields were derived in ref.…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)197mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of derivatives in these vertices, as the light-cone formulation elucidates, is restricted, which provides a way of classifying them [8,9]. The complete list of such vertices for bosonic fields appeared already in [10,11], but their explicit construction may call for the Noether procedure [12][13][14] or the BRST-BV cohomological methods [6,7,15,16]. The tensionless limit of open string theory, on the other hand, yields a set of cubic vertices in one-to-one correspondence with that found in the light-cone formulation [17,18].…”
Section: Jhep01(2014)087mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The picture that emerges is a general consensus on the overall structure of the cubic interactions. The results have been derived using different formalistic apparatuses: (i) field theoretic Noether-coupling/BRST methods (see for instance [38][39][40]) generalizing the approach of the 1984 work of Berends, Burgers and vanDam [19], (ii) limits of the Vasiliev theory (see for instance [41,42]) cubic interactions [20], (iii) limits of string amplitudes [21,43], (iv) string field theory (see for instance [44][45][46]) inspired BRST-methods [9,47,48] in the spirit of the present author's 1988 paper [16], (v) FDA-L ∞ -methods [8], (vi) generating function Noether methods [49,50] generalizing BBvD [7,36,37], and finally (vii) light-front methods by Metsaev [1,2,6] extending the original results of [4,5,35].…”
Section: Relation To Current Research On Minkowski Space Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 92%