General Theorizing and Historical Specificity in the ‘Keynes Versus the Classics’ Dispute

Togati, Teodoro Dario

doi:10.1057/s41302-020-00177-1

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(14 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many PK do not see problems in Keynes's generality stance and simply suggest that his critique of standard theory is right (e.g., Gerrard, 1995); 2. Others call into question Keynes's generality claim itself because he neglects history and institutional detail (e.g., Hodgson, 2001, for analysis of this issue see Togati, 2020); 3. Only a few raise the issue of Keynes's postulates.…”

Section: The Limitations Of the Debate Over Generalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

On the “Generality” of the General Theory. Or Why Keynes Lost His Battle and What to Do to Re-win It Again

Togati¹

2020

CBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper emphasizes the true "generality" of the General Theory (GT) in the face of the dominant view, according to which Keynes's theory is captured by "Keynesian outcomes" in axiomatic general equilibrium models due to market imperfections. However, it argues that the advocates of generality must make a serious effort to re-conceptualize the GT in a very broad perspective. One must understand both its limitations and why the generality debate after the GT has failed to reconsider it in a proper way and what to do to restore Keynes's generality claim in the present context. This paper's contribution is twofold. The first is to make a distinction between three different dimensions of the generality issue and suggest that Keynes failed to grasp their full significance because he was facing the Marshallian orthodoxy, rather than general equilibrium. The second contribution is to suggest that one way to restore Keynes's generality claim is to stress that he belongs to an alternative paradigm that has several features in common with contemporary modernist revolution and with Einstein's relativity theory in particular.

show abstract

Section: The Limitations Of the Debate Over Generalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First of all, the Einsteinian perspective helps us to understand that the GT is a product of Modernism-an extraordinary period which sees many contemporary revolutions and projects of "general theory" in several fields, from art to physics-involving a sharp departure from XIX century approaches (see also Togati, 2012;2018;2020).…”

Section: Postulatesmentioning

confidence: 99%