2017
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General, Target, and Accessible Population: Demystifying the Concepts for Effective Sampling

Abstract: In this paper the concepts of general, target and accessible population are explained in response to misconceptions and controversies associated with them, and the fact that the relationships between them have not been explained in the context of qualitative enquiry in any formal study. These concepts are discussed in this study based on a general scenario. We basically attempt to explain the importance of specifying the general, target and accessible populations in a qualitative study when the study populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Meetings were held with employees of the various RCBs together with the managers of the banks to explain the study’s objectives and offer assurances of confidentiality and non-bank-specific aggregation of data for purposes of analysis. The total accessible population of 105 RCBs branches was 955 employees who met selection criteria in accordance with Asiamah et al (2017). The selection criteria required that (a) one was a permanent employee of the bank; (b) one had worked in the bank for at least 6 months, this was to ensure each participant had substantial experience with the bank’s climate; (c) one had at least basic education or the ability to read and write in the English language, which was a medium of communicating items in questionnaires; and (d) the existence of demographic information about the employee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meetings were held with employees of the various RCBs together with the managers of the banks to explain the study’s objectives and offer assurances of confidentiality and non-bank-specific aggregation of data for purposes of analysis. The total accessible population of 105 RCBs branches was 955 employees who met selection criteria in accordance with Asiamah et al (2017). The selection criteria required that (a) one was a permanent employee of the bank; (b) one had worked in the bank for at least 6 months, this was to ensure each participant had substantial experience with the bank’s climate; (c) one had at least basic education or the ability to read and write in the English language, which was a medium of communicating items in questionnaires; and (d) the existence of demographic information about the employee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the overall population size was 598. Two selection criteria were used to select members of the target population according to the definition of Asiamah et al (2017a). These are: the individual must have worked in the hospital for at least a year; and a nurse must be able to write and read well in English. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the target population size of the study was 579. Based on the definition of Asiamah et al (2017a), the accessible population of this study was individuals who were willing and available to participate in the study. The target and accessible population sizes in this study were the same because all nurses (of the target population) agreed to participate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, two teachers with experience in teaching slow learner students in special education classes for more than 5 years were also selected as study participants. Selecting a suitable study sample enables the researcher to obtain accurate research information or data [15]. Meanwhile, a total of 10 students were randomly selected to be interviewed.…”
Section: Population and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%