2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep22765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General solution of 2D and 3D superconducting quasiclassical systems: coalescing vortices and nanoisland geometries

Abstract: An extension of quasiclassical Keldysh-Usadel theory to higher spatial dimensions than one is crucial in order to describe physical phenomena like charge/spin Hall effects and topological excitations like vortices and skyrmions, none of which are captured in one-dimensional models. We here present a numerical finite element method which solves the non-linearized 2D and 3D quasiclassical Usadel equation relevant for the diffusive regime. We show the application of this on three model systems with non-trivial ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do this by means of the finite element method, using the finite element library libMesh 11 in a similar fashion as in ref. 12 (for details, see Supplementary Note 1 , Supplementary Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do this by means of the finite element method, using the finite element library libMesh 11 in a similar fashion as in ref. 12 (for details, see Supplementary Note 1 , Supplementary Fig. 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We comment here that multiterminal geometries beyond effective 1D models can also be treated using the recently developed15 numerical solution of the full Usadel equation in 3D, allowing for the study of non-trivial geometrical effects. Moreover, previous works have considered analytical solutions of the Usadel equation using the so-called θ -parametrization in SN bilayers161718 and also approximate solutions in the SNS case192021, whereas in our work the analytical solution is exact for the key cases of (i) and (ii) for phase differences nπ between the terminals.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the linear arrangement of the vortices along the superconducting interface is modified by insulating boundaries [9][10][11][12], in a junction of lateral width W comparable to the separation L of the interfaces. But in wide junctions (W L), when boundary effects are irrelevant, only linear arrangements of Josephson vortices are known [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%