2004
DOI: 10.1080/13501780410001694109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General selection theory and economic evolution: The Price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction

Abstract: The purpose of the present article is to strengthen the conceptualisation of the principle of selection in theories of economic evolution and to help clarify a number of unsettled issues regarding the meaning of variety and continuity. In order to achieve this, the emerging general mathematical selection theory is introduced to identify the requirements of a general principle of selection and the specification of variety and continuity that follows from it. It is indicated how general selection theory can help… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The critique of such arguments by Mesoudi et al is considerably weakened by their neglect of an immense literature in the social sciences, particularly in evolutionary economics (e.g., Nelson & Winter 1982;Young 1998) and organizational ecology (e.g., Hannan & Freeman 1989), where Darwinian themes are central. Their stance is further weakened by its neglect of the recent development of general Darwinian concepts of replication and selection in the theory and philosophy of biology (e.g., Frank 1998;Hull 2001;Knudsen 2004;Price 1995). Even though David Hull's work is mentioned, one of its central messages is neglected: An adequate definition of selection processes where variety is replenished demands consideration of the causal relation between interaction and replication.…”
Section: N O T E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critique of such arguments by Mesoudi et al is considerably weakened by their neglect of an immense literature in the social sciences, particularly in evolutionary economics (e.g., Nelson & Winter 1982;Young 1998) and organizational ecology (e.g., Hannan & Freeman 1989), where Darwinian themes are central. Their stance is further weakened by its neglect of the recent development of general Darwinian concepts of replication and selection in the theory and philosophy of biology (e.g., Frank 1998;Hull 2001;Knudsen 2004;Price 1995). Even though David Hull's work is mentioned, one of its central messages is neglected: An adequate definition of selection processes where variety is replenished demands consideration of the causal relation between interaction and replication.…”
Section: N O T E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic spirit follows a longstanding tradition of both evolutionary economists [17][18][19][20] and evolutionary population biologists [21][22][23]] to decompose population growth into different metrics of diversity, usually variance and covariance terms (such as done by the famous Price equation). Our equations also decompose growth in a similar manner, but use diversity metrics like entropies and mutual information instead.…”
Section: Evolutionary Economics: Decomposing Growth Descriptivelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, he used artificial selection as an exemplar for natural selection. Furthermore, at a high level of abstraction, artificial and natural selection share an identical definition (Hull 1988, Price 1995, Knudsen 2004). …”
Section: Can Darwinism Cope With Intentionality?mentioning
confidence: 99%