2019
DOI: 10.3390/e22010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Relativistic Wormhole Connections from Planck-Scales and the ER = EPR Conjecture

Abstract: Einstein's equations of general relativity (GR) can describe the connection between events within a given hypervolume of size L larger than the Planck length L P in terms of wormhole connections where metric fluctuations give rise to an indetermination relationship that involves the Riemann curvature tensor. At low energies (when L ≫ L P ), these connections behave like an exchange of a virtual graviton with wavelength λ G = L as if gravitation were an emergent physical property. Down to Planck scales, wormhol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(100 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, instead of models like ER=EPR 22 , ER=EPR, it has also been hinted that Planck scale black holes may connect entangled particles. Again the analysis is focused on AdS and it does not explore the implications of allowing paths contributing to the Path Integrals between the particles to traverse the black holes [328,326,327]. [86] refers to non-traversable wormholes.…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, instead of models like ER=EPR 22 , ER=EPR, it has also been hinted that Planck scale black holes may connect entangled particles. Again the analysis is focused on AdS and it does not explore the implications of allowing paths contributing to the Path Integrals between the particles to traverse the black holes [328,326,327]. [86] refers to non-traversable wormholes.…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 67) implies a non-zero lower bound on the minimum value of the uncertainty on the particle's position which is of order of the Planck length [28,37]. In other words, the GUP implies the existence of a minimal length L in quantum gravity also when Einstein's equations hold down to the Planck scales [38]. Following this hypothesis, instead of focusing on the energy-tensor quantity such as the momentum vector, we obtain an equivalent indetermination relationship from an invariant scalar quantity, the proper energy E. To obtain E one integrates and averages Einstein's equations over a 3D space-like hypersurface, σ, with unit normal vector n ∼ g −1/2 .…”
Section: A Review Of Rosen's Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more exotic interpretation can be given with the ER = EPR scenario, where the two events forming the spacetime texture (or the relationship between the two "particles" of our "gravitational hydrogen atom") represent the connection of events in spacetime through an Einstein-Rosen (ER) wormhole supposed to be equivalent to a connection between events through Einstein-Podolski-Rosen quantum entangled states [38].…”
Section: A Review Of Rosen's Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this ansatz, the formulation of a new Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) should be mandatory to study physics at very high energies or, equivalently, at short distance scales; quantum gravitational corrections are expected to prevent black hole (BH) evaporation near the Planck scale [4], as also suggested in Ref. [5]. The formulation of a GUP has implications in various fields [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]; black hole physics, String Theory [26,27], Loop Quantum Gravity [28], Deformed Special Relativity [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], where not only General Relativity (GR) but also Quantum Mechanics (QM) breaks down, suggest that the HUP can be obtained by introducing quantum-gravitational corrections to the classical definition of the commutator of two conjugate variables, such as the coordinate x and the momentum p with their corresponding operators x and p, [x, p] = i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%