General Regulatory Powers and Duties of State and Local Health Authorities

Moldenhauer, Ruth M.; Greve, Clifford H.

doi:10.2307/4588440

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We contend that legal epidemiology explores how specific laws and legal practices impact health outcomes and conditions structural determinants of health. The public health research community has long embraced policy surveillance [ 79 , 80 ], or the means by which varied stakeholders use longitudinal legal and health data to “track the occurrence, antecedents, time course, geographic spread, consequences, and nature of disease, injury, and risk factors among the populations they serve” ([ 79 ], p. 141).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal and Medical Distrust Held by Correctional Officers

Kerrison

2023

Vaccines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among prison security staff and the extent to which they trust varied sources of information about the vaccines. Cross-sectional survey data were obtained from a state-wide sample of corrections officers (COs, hereafter; n = 1208) in February 2021. Group differences, disaggregated by demographic characteristics, were examined using F-tests and t-tests. Despite the comparatively limited risk of contracting the virus, non-security staff reported they would accept a COVID-19 vaccine at no cost (74%), compared to their more vulnerable CO counterparts (49%). We observed vaccine refusal correlations between COs’ reported gender, age, and length of time working as a CO, but none with their self-reported race. Vaccine refusal was more prevalent among womxn officers, younger officers, and those who had spent less time working as prison security staff. Our findings also suggest that the only trusted source of information about vaccines were family members and only for officers who would refuse the vaccine; the quality of trust placed in those sources, however, was not substantially positive and did not vary greatly across CO racial groups. By highlighting characteristics of the observed gaps in COVID-19 vaccine acceptance between COs and their non-security staff coworkers, as well as between corrections officers of varied demographic backgrounds, these findings can inform the development of responsive and accepted occupational health policies for communities both inside and intrinsically linked to prisons.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal and Medical Distrust Held by Correctional Officers

Kerrison

2023

Vaccines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Along with important treatises on the police power (28, 79), books devoted solely to public health law were written as early as 1892 (6, 60). Tobey maintained a treatise through the 1930s (80), and articles providing an overview of public health legal authority appeared in public health journals every decade or so (39, 48, 55). In the 1950s, the Public Health Law Research Project at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law proposed revisions to hospital, vital statistics and disease prevention and control, and local health administration laws, at least some of which were adopted (72).…”

Section: Public Health Law Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impulse to track the law in a complex federal system is an old one (37,55). A recent Internet scan turned up hundreds of web pages reporting current 50-state assessments of health law (66).…”

Section: “Legal Epidemiology”mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of Legal Epidemiology

Burris

Ashe

Levin

et al. 2016

Annu. Rev. Public Health

120

153

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Public health law has roots in both law and science. For more than a century, lawyers have helped develop and implement health laws; over the past 50 years, scientific evaluation of the health effects of laws and legal practices has achieved high levels of rigor and influence. We describe an emerging model of public health law that unites these two traditions. This transdisciplinary model adds scientific practices to the lawyerly functions of normative and doctrinal research, counseling, and representation. These practices include policy surveillance and empirical public health law research on the efficacy of legal interventions and the impact of laws and legal practices on health and health system operation. A transdisciplinary model of public health law, melding its legal and scientific facets, can help break down enduring cultural, disciplinary, and resource barriers that have prevented the full recognition and optimal role of law in public health.

show abstract

“…Such legal mapping studies assessing state and local health laws go back at least seventy-five years in the health literature (Fowler 1941), and have become common in the past thirty years, covering a wide range of topics. Studies of "infrastructural health law" (defining the basic powers, duties, and limitations of health agencies at the state and local level) have appeared regularly (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1994;Enterline et al 1984;Fowler 1941;Gostin et al 1996, Greve 1953Hein and Bauer 1964;Moldenhauer and Greve 1953). Even more common have been assessments capturing the nature of and variation in laws 5 directly addressing specific health problems, including such important interventions as access to contraceptives (Merz, Jackson, and Klerman 1995;Warren 1964), smoking and tobacco control (Choi, Novotny, and Thimis 1992;Shelton et al 1995), syringe exchange (Burris et al 1996;Burris et al 2002), tuberculosis control (Gostin 1993), and expedited partner therapy for sexually transmitted infections (Hodge et al 2008).…”

Section: The Emergence Of Policy Surveillancementioning

confidence: 99%

Policy Surveillance: A Vital Public Health Practice Comes of Age: Table 1

Burris¹,

Hitchcock²,

Ibrahim³

et al. 2016

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments use statutes, regulations, and policies, often in innovative ways, to promote health and safety. Organizations outside government, from private schools to major corporations, create rules on matters as diverse as tobacco use and paid sick leave. Very little of this activity is systematically tracked. Even as the rest of the health system is working to build, share, and use a wide range of health and social data, legal information largely remains trapped in text files and pdfs, excluded from the universe of usable data. This article makes the case for the practice of policy surveillance to help end the anomalous treatment of law in public health research and practice. Policy surveillance is the systematic, scientific collection and analysis of laws of public health significance. It meets several important needs. Scientific collection and coding of important laws and policies creates data suitable for use in rigorous evaluation studies. Policy surveillance addresses the chronic lack of readily accessible, nonpartisan information about status and trends in health legislation and policy. It provides the opportunity to build policy capacity in the public health workforce. We trace its emergence over the past fifty years, show its value, and identify major challenges ahead.

show abstract

General Regulatory Powers and Duties of State and Local Health Authorities

Cited by 5 publications

References 1 publication

COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal and Medical Distrust Held by Correctional Officers

COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal and Medical Distrust Held by Correctional Officers

A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of Legal Epidemiology

Policy Surveillance: A Vital Public Health Practice Comes of Age: Table 1

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About