2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2423325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General reconstruction formulas for analyzer-based computed tomography

Abstract: General formulas are derived for computed tomography reconstruction in analyzer-based imaging. Two image acquisition geometries are investigated. In the first geometry, which is widely used, the rotation axis of the object is perpendicular to that of the analyzer crystal. In the second geometry, in which the rotation axes are parallel, the reconstruction formulas are shown to be significantly simpler and more stable with respect to noise in experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phase-imaging method employed here is equivalent to x-ray grating interferometry or analyzer-based imaging as the measured signal is the differential phase signal ∇φ [6,8,28]. In these methods, a specific filter is often used in the inverse Radon transform to account for the specificity of the signal and perform a one-dimensional integration in the Fourier space [29,30]. Here, as the XSVT technique provides the two transverse differential phase maps, in contrast to the previous techniques, the phase images can be recovered by 2D integration by matrix inversion via, for instance, the Cholesky decomposition.…”
Section: Xsvt-based Tomography With An Interlaced Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase-imaging method employed here is equivalent to x-ray grating interferometry or analyzer-based imaging as the measured signal is the differential phase signal ∇φ [6,8,28]. In these methods, a specific filter is often used in the inverse Radon transform to account for the specificity of the signal and perform a one-dimensional integration in the Fourier space [29,30]. Here, as the XSVT technique provides the two transverse differential phase maps, in contrast to the previous techniques, the phase images can be recovered by 2D integration by matrix inversion via, for instance, the Cholesky decomposition.…”
Section: Xsvt-based Tomography With An Interlaced Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the research of phase contrast imaging, the FBP method has been commonly exploited in CT reconstruction [15-17]. Applying the FBP method requires a large amount of projection data, which can prolong scanning time and cumulate with a high dose of radiation potentially damaging the biological specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase contrast X-ray imaging [ 9 - 13 ] enables the observation of light samples, such as biological soft tissue, without a contrast agent, because the phase shift cross sections of light elements are much larger than their absorption cross sections [ 14 ]. However, in the research of phase contrast imaging, the FBP method has been commonly exploited in CT reconstruction [ 15 - 17 ]. Applying the FBP method requires a large amount of projection data, which can prolong scanning time and cumulate with a high dose of radiation potentially damaging the biological specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step has so far been solved by using a filtered back-projection (FBP) algorithm with an imaginary Hilbert filter (Pfeiffer et al 2007b). Meanwhile, this class of algorithm has also been extended to fan beam and cone beam scanning geometries by several groups (Faris and Byer 1988, Nesterets et al 2006, Pfeiffer et al 2007b, 2008b, Jerjen et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%