General practitioners’ views of clinically led commissioning: cross-sectional survey in England

Abstract

ObjectivesInvolving general practitioners (GPs) in the commissioning/purchasing of services has been an important element in English health policy for many years. The Health and Social Care Act 2012 handed responsibility for commissioning of the majority of care for local populations to GP-led Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). In this paper, we explore GP attitudes to involvement in commissioning and future intentions for engagement.Design and settingSurvey of a random sample of GPs across England in 2015.MethodThe Eighth National GP Worklife Survey was distributed to GPs in spring 2015. Responses were received from 2611 respondents (response rate = 46%). We compared responses across different GP characteristics and conducted two sample tests of proportions to identify statistically significant differences in responses across groups. We also used multivariate logistic regression to identify the characteristics associated with wanting a formal CCG role in the future.ResultsWhile GPs generally agree that they can add value to aspects of commissioning, only a minority feel that this is an important part of their role. Many current leaders intend to quit in the next 5 years, and there is limited appetite among those not currently in a formal role to take up such a role in the future. CCGs were set up as ‘membership organisations’ but only a minority of respondents reported feeling that they had ‘ownership’ of their local CCG and these were often GPs with formal CCG roles. However, respondents generally agree that the CCG has a legitimate role in influencing the work that they do.ConclusionCCGs need to engage in active succession planning to find the next generation of GP leaders. GPs believe that CCGs have a legitimate role in influencing their work, suggesting that there may be scope for CCGs to involve GPs more fully in roles short of formal leadership.

“No generics, Doctor!” The perspective of general practitioners in two French regions

“…More fundamentally, some surveyed physicians did not seem to adhere to their assigned role regarding the development of the generics market. It is known that many GPs do not wish to exercise the economic accountability that the authorities want them to endorse [ 33 ], especially when they feel that it could contravene their own professional ethical rules [ 34 ].…”

The influence of training experiences on career intentions of the future GP workforce: a qualitative study of new GPs in England

“…In addition to well-established involvement in medical education, policy-driven changes in primary care have necessitated further diversification of roles for GPs; prominent examples include involvement in annual appraisal processes, and in healthcare commissioning and provider organisations 15 , 16…”

Factors in implementation of clinical commissioning policy in improving health and wellbeing and/or reducing health inequalities in the English NHS: a systematic review of the evidence

“…58 Moran et al's survey of over 2600 GPs, claimed that though approximately 30% of the GPs agreed that commissioning was part of their role and responsibilities, most of them also agreed that their involvement would add value to the commissioning process in terms of in uence and address the local healthcare needs. 59 NHS Commissioning Board 13 complements existing research claiming that "clinical leadership would signi cantly improve their performance in their practices" in the NHS. Clinical leadership is, therefore,…”

“…58 Our study also found that power and decisions have been shared with communities and service providers, but still there are some gaps or challenges in terms of transformation of funds and availability of funds to run community services and their priorities are structured differently. 59 Therefore, changing culture of communities from passive consumers to active partners would be one of many options to make wider access to healthcare possible. 58 Atkins et al's nding in this context might be useful because they suggest that we: "should work more clearly with local government public health team to de ne research questions [issues] through the lenses of local government and their proprieties and imperatives, taking into account the context of the signi cant loss of resources local government are dealing with."…”