General Practitioners' Perceptions of the Use of Wearable Electronic Health Monitoring Devices: Qualitative Analysis of Risks and Benefits

Abstract

Background The rapid diffusion of wearable electronic health monitoring devices (wearable devices or wearables) among lay populations shows that self-tracking and self-monitoring are pervasively expanding, while influencing health-related practices. General practitioners are confronted with this phenomenon, since they often are the expert-voice that patients will seek. Objective This article aims to explore general practitioners’ perceptions of the role of wearable devices in family medicine and of their benefits, risks, and challenges associated with their use. It also explores their perceptions of the future development of these devices. Methods Data were collected during a medical conference among 19 Swiss general practitioners through mind maps. Maps were first sketched at the conference and their content was later compared with notes and reports written during the conference, which allowed for further integration of information. This tool represents an innovative methodology in qualitative research that allows for time-efficient data collection and data analysis. Results Data analysis highlighted that wearable devices were described as user-friendly, adaptable devices that could enable performance monitoring and support medical research. Benefits included support for patients’ empowerment and education, behavior change facilitation, better awareness of personal medical history and body functioning, efficient information transmission, and connection with the patient’s medical network; however, general practitioners were concerned by a lack of scientific validation, lack of clarity over data protection, and the risk of stakeholder-associated financial interests. Other perceived risks included the promotion of an overly medicalized health culture and the risk of supporting patients’ self-diagnosis and self-medication. General practitioners also feared increased pressure on their workload and a compromised doctor–patient relationship. Finally, they raised important questions that can guide wearables’ future design and development, highlighting a need for general practitioners and medical professionals to be involved in the process. Conclusions Wearables play an increasingly central role in daily health-related practices, and general practitioners expressed a desire to become more involved in the development of such technologies. Described as useful information providers, wearables were generally positively perceived and did not seem to pose a threat to the doctor–patient relationship. However, general practitioners expressed their concern that wearables may fuel a self-monitoring logic, to the detriment of patients’ autonomy and overall well-being. While wearables can contribute to health promotion, it is crucial to clarify the logic underpinning the design of such devices. Through the analysis of group discussions, this study contributes to the existing literature by presenting general practitioners’ perceptions of wearable devices. This paper provides insight on general practitioners’ perception to be considered in the context of product development and marketing.

Artificial intelligence assisted acute patient journey

“…Though the advent of digital health tools will improve healthcare, it comes with challenges such as the reliability and validity of mHealth devices, access of the third party to patients' data, and lack of patient data management. Similarly, continuous monitoring might increase stress and raise concerns about patients' health (Volpato et al, 2021 ). Explainability is another critical challenge.…”

Co-Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Health Monitoring Tool Using Smartwatch Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study

“…Analysis of user-generated smartwatch data offers opportunities to improve lifestyle and health outcomes as well as overall healthcare delivery [1][2][3][4][5]. Machine Learning (ML) and deep learning techniques have previously been used to analyse the physiological big data collected by smartwatches to detect the onset of diseases such as cardiovascular disease, Parkinson's disease, mental health disorders, dementia, asthma, and COVID-19 [2,[6][7][8].…”

“…Integration of wearables into EMR still has to be improved and standardized for wider acceptance into healthcare practice for preventive care [3]. One of the key requirements for the successful clinical application of smartwatch data is understanding HCP perspectives on whether these devices can play a role in preventive care [1,3,4]. Gaining these perspectives would shift the focus of development from designing systems for users to designing systems with users [17,18], and healthcare providers should be directly involved in the development of the technology that will, ultimately, impact them.…”

Implementing Virtual Care in Neurology - Challenges and Pitfalls

“…One of the key challenges is to create a user experience that should be very friendly, 44 , 45 intuitive, and delightful to use. Elderly patients will be using the system frequently, and special accommodation, eg, large icons and text, should be a design priority.…”