General Practitioners’ Knowledge and Concern about Electromagnetic Fields

Abstract

Our aim is to explore general practitioners’ (GPs’) knowledge about EMF, and to assess whether different knowledge structures are related to the GPs’ concern about EMF. Random samples were drawn from lists of GPs in Germany in 2008. Knowledge about EMF was assessed by seven items. A latent class analysis was conducted to identify latent structures in GPs’ knowledge. Further, the GPs’ concern about EMF health risk was measured using a score comprising six items. The association between GPs’ concern about EMF and their knowledge was analysed using multiple linear regression. In total 435 (response rate 23.3%) GPs participated in the study. Four groups were identified by the latent class analysis: 43.1% of the GPs gave mainly correct answers; 23.7% of the GPs answered low frequency EMF questions correctly; 19.2% answered only the questions relating EMF with health risks, and 14.0% answered mostly “don’t know”. There was no association between GPs’ latent knowledge classes or between the number of correct answers given by the GPs and their EMF concern, whereas the number of incorrect answers was associated with EMF concern. Greater EMF concern in subjects with more incorrect answers suggests paying particular attention to misconceptions regarding EMF in risk communication.

Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals

“…Therefore, results should be taken with caution and further studies with better response rate and involving larger and more representative sample are needed to confirm our findings. Nonetheless, the overall response rate to our web-based questionnaire (11%) was similar to [18,36,37] or slightly lower [38,39] than that of other surveys in which HPs replied to an online questionnaire. The participation rate in our study varied from 2.5% (GPs) to 28.0% (GOs and MWs).…”

How to assess seriousness? A new tool to help non-experts evaluate published information using a sample text on Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)

“…These are important coefficients of decision-making [25]. The limiting factors are the period required for comprehensive research and the availability of essential resources.…”

Knowledge, risk perception and information needs of general practitioners regarding potential health effects of electromagnetic fields: A scoping review of the scientific literature

“…All studies were conducted in Central/Western Europe. Five out of the nine records refer to a German study that was first published in 2009 with four more articles from the same study being published until 2015 , Berg-Beckhoff et al, 2014, Kowall et al, 2015. The remaining studies were from Austria (Leitgeb et al, 2005), France (Lambrozo et al, 2013), the Netherlands (Slottje et al, 2017) and Switzerland (Huss und Röösli, 2006).…”

“…For every question, almost one third picked the option 'I don't know'. An additional latent class analysis revealed four kinds of answer types: GPs who answered correctly most of the time; GPs who mainly chose 'I don't know'; GPs who were primarily able to answer questions on low-frequency EMF and GPs who answered health-related questions (correct or incorrect) and picked 'I don't know' for the remaining questions , Berg-Beckhoff et al, 2014.…”