2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Patterns of Diversity in Major Marine Microeukaryote Lineages

Abstract: Microeukaryotes have vital roles for the functioning of marine ecosystems, but still some general characteristics of their current diversity and phylogeny remain unclear. Here we investigated both aspects in major oceanic microeukaryote lineages using 18S rDNA (V4–V5 hypervariable regions) sequences from public databases that derive from various marine environmental surveys. A very carefully and manually curated dataset of 8291 Sanger sequences was generated and subsequently split into 65 taxonomic groups (rou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The table was manually curated by removing OTUs represented by short sequences (o250 bp) and OTUs that occurred in only one sample, regardless of their abundance (Supplementary Figure S1). OTUs were then taxonomically assigned using three reference databases: SILVA 108 (Quast et al, 2013), PR 2 and MAS9013, an in-house database (Pernice et al, 2013; available on request). SILVA 108 was used to exclude prokaryotic 16S rDNA OTUs, whereas PR 2 and MAS9013 were used to classify eukaryotic OTUs mostly to the class level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table was manually curated by removing OTUs represented by short sequences (o250 bp) and OTUs that occurred in only one sample, regardless of their abundance (Supplementary Figure S1). OTUs were then taxonomically assigned using three reference databases: SILVA 108 (Quast et al, 2013), PR 2 and MAS9013, an in-house database (Pernice et al, 2013; available on request). SILVA 108 was used to exclude prokaryotic 16S rDNA OTUs, whereas PR 2 and MAS9013 were used to classify eukaryotic OTUs mostly to the class level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final curated reads were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by using UCLUST 1.2.22 (45), with similarity thresholds of 97% for V4 reads and 95% for V9 reads. Representative reads of each OTU were taxonomically classified by using BLAST against SILVA108, PR2, and a marine microeukaryote database (46). After the taxonomic assignment, metazoan OTUs were removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, these high numbers may be due to missing intraspecific sequence variation in the PR 2 reference database, which usually contains only one accession per species. In natural communities, intraspecific genetic variation of microbial organisms may be much more diverse than just a few base pair differences, especially in hypervariable gene regions (Brown et al, 2015;Decelle et al, 2014;Dunthorn et al, 2012;Pernice et al, 2013 (2014) and Gimmler and Stoeck (2015).…”
Section: Contrasting Otu Results From Three Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%