2014 14th International Conference on Quality Software 2014
DOI: 10.1109/qsic.2014.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Optimization Strategies for Refining the In-Parameter-Order Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six of our models under test have more than 20 parameters (i.e., Program 6, 12-15 and 17 shown in Table II). Eight modeled programs have more than 10 values per parameter on average (i.e., Program 1,7,9,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17]. Three programs contain more than 20 parameters and more than 10 values per parameter on average (i.e., Program 12,15 and 17).…”
Section: B Generation Time and Number Of Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Six of our models under test have more than 20 parameters (i.e., Program 6, 12-15 and 17 shown in Table II). Eight modeled programs have more than 10 values per parameter on average (i.e., Program 1,7,9,10,[12][13][14][15][16][17]. Three programs contain more than 20 parameters and more than 10 values per parameter on average (i.e., Program 12,15 and 17).…”
Section: B Generation Time and Number Of Test Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several testing strategies have been proposed to reduce the number of combinations that have to be enumerated and the time to generate test cases. A combinatorial testing strategy called In-Parameter-Order (IPO) has been used in several different algorithms to handle problems such as the sheer number of test cases and long generation times [12] for 2-way testing. The In-Parameter-Order-General (IPOG) algorithm has been proposed as a variant of the IPO strategy that supports higher strength than 2-way [13], [14].…”
Section: A Combinatorial Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the IPOG algorithm is given to generate t-way covering array in [9]. IPOG-D [17], IPOG-F and IPOG-F2 algorithms [18,19,20], which are the variation of IPOG, are put forward. Generally speaking, the first class greedy algorithm is able to construct a relatively small size of covering arrays at the cost of time, while the second class greedy algorithm is able to construct a test suite with trivial covering arrays but less time overhead.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%