1996
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3774(95)01221-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General irrigation efficiency for field water management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical irrigation ef® ciencies are usually de® ned as ratios of water volume bene® cially used by plants to volumes of water delivered through an irrigation system, with adjustments for effective rainfall and changes in the volume of w ater stored in the root zone (Burt et al, 1997). Field application ef® ciency pertains to water deliveries on individual ® elds, while distribution ef® ciency describes water movement from a conveyance system to ® eld turnouts, and conveyance ef® ciency pertains to canals and facilities located between a reservoir and a distributary system (Bos, 1979;Hansen et al, 1980;Bos & Nugteren, 1982;W ang et al, 1996). Project ef® ciency is determined by combining estimates of conveyance, distribution and ® eld application ef® ciencies.…”
Section: Irrigation Ef® Ciencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Classical irrigation ef® ciencies are usually de® ned as ratios of water volume bene® cially used by plants to volumes of water delivered through an irrigation system, with adjustments for effective rainfall and changes in the volume of w ater stored in the root zone (Burt et al, 1997). Field application ef® ciency pertains to water deliveries on individual ® elds, while distribution ef® ciency describes water movement from a conveyance system to ® eld turnouts, and conveyance ef® ciency pertains to canals and facilities located between a reservoir and a distributary system (Bos, 1979;Hansen et al, 1980;Bos & Nugteren, 1982;W ang et al, 1996). Project ef® ciency is determined by combining estimates of conveyance, distribution and ® eld application ef® ciencies.…”
Section: Irrigation Ef® Ciencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among the efficiencies that are most frequently utilized in comparing the performance of different water application systems are the application efficiency and the storage efficiency (Wang et al, 1996). In the present study, these efficiencies were used to compare water use under normal application with that under variable rate application.…”
Section: System Efficiency Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate irrigation system design and management and the use of traditional irrigation methods have been reported to cause large water losses in agricultural fields (Wang et al, 1996;Howell, 2001). Irrigation system upgrade and replacement can mitigate water shortages or lead to increased irrigated area to cope with rapid population growth (Rijsberman, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%