2011
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General framework for estimating the ultimate precision limit in noisy quantum-enhanced metrology

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

44
1,081
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 853 publications
(1,139 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
44
1,081
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So far the analysis of noisy measurement schemes was limited only to schemes governed by linear generators leading to some very pessimistic results [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Although, under certain circumstances such as the presence of non-Markovian environments [20,21], or frequency estimation with transversal noise [22], some improvement in the precision with respect to the shot-noise limit can be observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far the analysis of noisy measurement schemes was limited only to schemes governed by linear generators leading to some very pessimistic results [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Although, under certain circumstances such as the presence of non-Markovian environments [20,21], or frequency estimation with transversal noise [22], some improvement in the precision with respect to the shot-noise limit can be observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand , however, interaction between a system and an environment is unavoidable in reality, and the quantum decoherence induced by such interactions may decrease the QFI and destroy the quantum entanglement in the probe system exploited to improve the precision. In this regard, It has been shown that the interaction between a system and an environment usually makes the measurements noisy, which in turn degrades the estimation precision [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior has been argued to be generic to all Heisenberg scaling schemes (see Refs. [20][21][22][23]), so it is not surprising that we also find this behavior here as well. We also showed that the von Neumann measurement interaction also has the phase accumulation effect, provided we prepared the meter states in momentum eigenstates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%