2022
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.106.032204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General framework for cyclic and fine-tuned causal models and their compatibility with space-time

Abstract: Causal modelling is a tool for generating causal explanations of observed correlations and has led to a deeper understanding of correlations in quantum networks. Existing frameworks for quantum causality tend to focus on acyclic causal structures that are not fine-tuned i.e., where causal connections between variables necessarily create correlations between them. However, fine-tuned causal models which permit causation without correlation, play a crucial role in cryptography, and cyclic causal models can be us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we would still caution that the expectation that the underlying structure should be causal (albeit not acyclic) should be treated with care, since these sorts of phenomena do not involve causal order and therefore there is no obvious reason to expect them to be best explicable in the context of a causal formalism, even one that has been generalized in certain ways. For example, ref [73] continues to maintain that the Bell correlations should be understood in terms of 'causation without signalling (i.e., fine-tuned causal influences)' whereas we have argued here that this is not the right way to think of the Bell correlations. This does not mean that research on cyclic causal structures should not be pursued, but it does mean that we should be prepared to be quite flexible about these kinds of models: assumptions that they must have certain prototypically causal features should be carefully examined, and discarded if they are not working well.…”
Section: Other Nonclassical Causal Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we would still caution that the expectation that the underlying structure should be causal (albeit not acyclic) should be treated with care, since these sorts of phenomena do not involve causal order and therefore there is no obvious reason to expect them to be best explicable in the context of a causal formalism, even one that has been generalized in certain ways. For example, ref [73] continues to maintain that the Bell correlations should be understood in terms of 'causation without signalling (i.e., fine-tuned causal influences)' whereas we have argued here that this is not the right way to think of the Bell correlations. This does not mean that research on cyclic causal structures should not be pursued, but it does mean that we should be prepared to be quite flexible about these kinds of models: assumptions that they must have certain prototypically causal features should be carefully examined, and discarded if they are not working well.…”
Section: Other Nonclassical Causal Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Another interesting line of research involves extending quantum causal models to allow for cyclic causal structures [70,73]. In light of the arguments we have made here, this seems like a promising approach, since one way to model symmetric relationships which can't be decomposed into a strict partial order would be to write them as cyclic structures in the context of a broader causal description.…”
Section: Other Nonclassical Causal Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causality is a concept of utmost importance in science [1]. In contrast to just observing correlations in arbitrary scenarios, it allows to ask why these occur, differentiating between cause and effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the following years, the respective approaches developed and diversified, bringing forth remarkable insights, some of which we will review over the course of this work. Nonetheless, to the best of the author's knowledge, [1] suggests the first framework which clearly separates the notions of relativistic and information-theoretic causality to explore their connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation