1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(91)90373-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General features of proton longitudinal relaxation in proteins in solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7], and K the kinetic matrix given above. The initial state of the A matrix, A(0), is given by the diagonal matrix: [12] where L 1F and L 2F are the free ligand concentrations, E, EL 1 , EL 2 , and EL 1 L 2 are the concentrations of the free receptor, the two binary complexes and the ternary complex.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[7], and K the kinetic matrix given above. The initial state of the A matrix, A(0), is given by the diagonal matrix: [12] where L 1F and L 2F are the free ligand concentrations, E, EL 1 , EL 2 , and EL 1 L 2 are the concentrations of the free receptor, the two binary complexes and the ternary complex.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leakage term * is generally set equal to 1 s Ϫ1 , and arises due to mobile portions of the protein which more effectively couple the magnetization to the lattice (7). In practice, it is convenient to calculate the relaxation matrix using a similarly sized interproton distance matrix, as described by Khan et al (8), with elements D ij ϭ r ij .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the effect of the large number of protons in the protein system essentially uncouples the relaxation behavior, so that a simple decay curve with a relaxation rate approximately equal to R~L, the first element of the relaxation matrix (see below), is obtained. This can be taken into account by using additional protons or, as illustrated by the dotted curve, by 265 adding a proton-relaxation sink corresponding to a rate of 1 s <, as is typically invoked for protein systems (Ishima et al, 1991). Hence, the effect of the large number of protein spins combined with rapid spin diffusion is to uncouple the fluorine spin-lattice relaxation so that approximately exponential behavior is observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From theoretical calculations Ishima and coworkers deduced that methyl groups act as relaxation sinks and should therefore lower the T 1 relaxation time to approximately 1.25 s [80]. Therefore, the saturation present during the off-resonance experiment is assumed to affect the binding epitope non-homogeneously if the recycling delay is set at inappropriate values (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%