An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis​: The Structural Gravity Model 2016
DOI: 10.30875/c144fdc4-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General equilibrium trade policy analysis with structural gravity

Abstract: The objective of this manuscript is to serve as a practical guide for evaluation of the general equilibrium (GE) effects of trade policy using the structural gravity model. We try to achieve this objective in four steps. First, we focus on the original Armington-CES gravity model, as a representative framework for a large class of GE models, to offer a deep analysis of the structural relationships underlying the general equilibrium gravity system, and how they can be exploited to make trade policy inferences. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by the theoretical model of Anderson et al (2019), 3 we specify two estimating gravity equationsone for trade and one for FDI, which are (i) consistent with and representative of a large number studies that quantify the impact of various determinants on FDI (e.g., Eicher et al, 2012;Blonigen and Piger, 2014;Kox and Rojas-Romagosa, 2020;Laget et al, 2021), and (ii) capitalize on the latest developments in the trade gravity literature (e.g., Head and Mayer, 2014;Yotov et al, 2016). Specically, we rely on the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum-Likelihood estimator to account for potential heteroskedasticity in the bilateral trade and FDI data and to take advantage of the information in the zero trade and FDI ows (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by the theoretical model of Anderson et al (2019), 3 we specify two estimating gravity equationsone for trade and one for FDI, which are (i) consistent with and representative of a large number studies that quantify the impact of various determinants on FDI (e.g., Eicher et al, 2012;Blonigen and Piger, 2014;Kox and Rojas-Romagosa, 2020;Laget et al, 2021), and (ii) capitalize on the latest developments in the trade gravity literature (e.g., Head and Mayer, 2014;Yotov et al, 2016). Specically, we rely on the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum-Likelihood estimator to account for potential heteroskedasticity in the bilateral trade and FDI data and to take advantage of the information in the zero trade and FDI ows (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%