2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.94.188702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Dynamics of Topology and Traffic on Weighted Technological Networks

Abstract: For most technical networks, the interplay of dynamics, traffic, and topology is assumed crucial to their evolution. In this Letter, we propose a traffic-driven evolution model of weighted technological networks. By introducing a general strength-coupling mechanism under which the traffic and topology mutually interact, the model gives power-law distributions of degree, weight, and strength, as confirmed in many real networks. Particularly, depending on a parameter W that controls the total weight growth of th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
128
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic model in Ref. [10] brings in a strength parameter, and the power-law distribution has γ ∈ (2,3]. Although it can provide a larger interval for γ by adjusting the strength parameter, it is a tedious job to assign a local strength to each edge.…”
Section: Scale-free Network: Instruction and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic model in Ref. [10] brings in a strength parameter, and the power-law distribution has γ ∈ (2,3]. Although it can provide a larger interval for γ by adjusting the strength parameter, it is a tedious job to assign a local strength to each edge.…”
Section: Scale-free Network: Instruction and Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most previous weighted random models [31,32,33,34,35] with topology and weight coevolution, however, possess very loose clustering structures when the size of the networks is large. At the same time, previous deterministic models, are mainly unweighted [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21], which ignore the heterogeneity of edges in real networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better mimic the reality, Barrat, Barthélemy, and Vespignani presented a growing model (BBV) for weighted networks, where the evolutions of degree and weight are coupled [15,16]. Enlightened by BBV's remarkable work, a variety of models and mechanisms for weighted networks have been proposed, including weight-driven model [17], traffic-driven evolution models [18,19], fitness models [20], local-world models [21,22,23], deterministic models [24,25,26], weight-dependent deactivation [27], spatial constraints [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%