2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General composition and protein surface hydrophobicity of goat, sheep and cow milk in the region of Mount Ida

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of cow milk samples was found to be highest whereas sheep milk samples had the lowest value. The differences in the ANS titration curve slopes within different origins were in accordance with Yuksel et al (2012). The differences between kinetic parameters that were calculated for cow, goat, sheep, and buffalo milks based upon ANS titration curves are shown in Fig.…”
Section: General Compositionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The slope of cow milk samples was found to be highest whereas sheep milk samples had the lowest value. The differences in the ANS titration curve slopes within different origins were in accordance with Yuksel et al (2012). The differences between kinetic parameters that were calculated for cow, goat, sheep, and buffalo milks based upon ANS titration curves are shown in Fig.…”
Section: General Compositionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Hydrophobic amino acid residues, always hiding inside protein, only exposure to the surface when protein unfolds. Therefore, surface hydrophobicity is widely used to observe the structure changes of protein (Yuksel, Avcı, Uymaz, & Erdem, 2012). As shown in Figure 1c, the S 0 ‐ANS value decreased significantly ( p < .05) with the increasing concentration of EGCG, which indicated that EGCG was beneficial for the increase of hydrophilicity of myofibril protein from yak meat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface hydrophobicity was determined by a spectrofluorometer (Shimadzu RF-5301, Kyoto, Japan) according to the method of Yuksel, Avci, Uymaz, and Erdem (2012), with a little modification. This allowed us to know the extent of exposed surface hydrophobic sites on the micelles.…”
Section: Determining the Surface Hydrophobicity Micellar Calcium Andmentioning
confidence: 99%