2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2018)130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General bootstrap equations in 4D CFTs

Abstract: We provide a framework for generic 4D conformal bootstrap computations. It is based on the unification of two independent approaches, the covariant (embedding) formalism and the non-covariant (conformal frame) formalism. We construct their main ingredients (tensor structures and differential operators) and establish a precise connection between them. We supplement the discussion by additional details like classification of tensor structures of n-point functions, normalization of 2-point functions and seed conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
148
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(239 reference statements)
1
148
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…by conformal symmetry, and can be produced by a variety of techniques [14][15][16][17]. For the specific case of chiral operators of interest to us we follow [18].…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)131mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by conformal symmetry, and can be produced by a variety of techniques [14][15][16][17]. For the specific case of chiral operators of interest to us we follow [18].…”
Section: Jhep02(2018)131mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a translation, we write the general formula (2.15) for the three-point function in the coordinates 17) where in the above > 0 enforces the operator ordering. When we perform the relevant integrations, the i terms will tell us how to pick the appropriate contour.…”
Section: Example Calculation: the (3 0) Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the δ 3 (p − q) comes from translation in invariance, δ m,m ′ comes from invariance under little group of p, 16 the power of p 2 is fixed by scaling invariance, and θ(p) restricts p to be in the forward null cone as required by positivity of energy. The only undetermined part here are the coefficients B m (∆, j).…”
Section: Two-point Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.38)As in the scalar example in the beginning of this section, we can now use this relation to analyze the poles of the conformal block, which come from the factor B m (∆, j) −1 . We start with the classification of such poles 16. Recall that the delta function δ 3 (p − q) sets q = p.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without loss of generality, we assume J 12 ≤ J 34 . The three-point function of a spin-1 conserved operator in a mixed symmetric state |(J,J), J 34 , J 12 , with (J,J) = |J 34 −J 12 | |J 34 +J 12 | 2 , can be conveniently written as[49,50]:(J,J), J 34 , J 12 |j 0 (η, ξ, φ)|(J,J), J 34 , J 12 = R −3 2|J−J| m=0 a m cos(2m η), (J,J), J 34 , J 12 |j φ (η, ξ, φ)|(J,J), J 34 , J 12 = R −3 2|J−J|+1 m=0 b m cos(2m η), (J,J), J 34 , J 12 |j ξ (η, ξ, φ)|(J,J), J 34 , J 12 = R −3 2|J−J|+1 m=0 c m cos(2m η).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%