Balancing Innovation and Operation 2020
DOI: 10.35199/norddesign2020.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General Approach to support Modelling of Data and Information Flows in Product Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dumas et al (2018) defines three general problems with process capturing: distributed process knowledge, case-thinking and missing understanding of process notations like BPML. Mehlstäubl et al (2020) reports a high abstraction of established methods. This is causing disadvantages, if information flows are to be considered, which should be done in these highly dynamic processes.…”
Section: Current Process Capturing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Dumas et al (2018) defines three general problems with process capturing: distributed process knowledge, case-thinking and missing understanding of process notations like BPML. Mehlstäubl et al (2020) reports a high abstraction of established methods. This is causing disadvantages, if information flows are to be considered, which should be done in these highly dynamic processes.…”
Section: Current Process Capturing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore established process management tools are not directly applicable to product development processes (Reolofsen and Lindemann, 2010). Mehlstäubl et al (2020) present characteristics of design processes in comparison to business processes. First of all, the result of the design process is only roughly known and not defined in detail.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Product Development Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations