2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(03)80916-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General and specific cognitive deficits in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
63
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
63
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of PIQ is significantly lower than VIQ, and the Processing Speed is the lowest of 4 indexes. The results are consistent with the past findings [9,[14][15][16][17][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The performance of PIQ is significantly lower than VIQ, and the Processing Speed is the lowest of 4 indexes. The results are consistent with the past findings [9,[14][15][16][17][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, analyses of the cognitive deficits found in patients compared to controls suggest that impairment on a single common factor accounts for the vast majority of the between-group difference on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Wechsler, 1997a) and Wechsler Memory Scale (Wechsler, 1997b) subtests, with more specific domains contributing very little unique between group variance (Dickinson et al, 2004). More recent approaches using CFA suggest a more generalized latent structure of cognitive ability in schizophrenia than in healthy subjects (Dickinson et al, in press).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If within group cognitive ability is generalized in schizophrenia, in the same way that the between group cognitive deficit appears to be (Dickinson et al, 2004), then questions arise concerning the nature of this generalized phenomenon. One way of under-standing it relates to traditional neuropsychological test batteries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on prior findings of significant method variance in pairs of variables from a single test (Dickinson et al, 2004;Gladsjo et al, 2004), we allowed unique (or error) parameters to covary for four pairs of variables in all models (i.e., the CVLT, Logical Memory, Trail Making Test, and WCST variables, see Table 1). Several widely-used measures were used to index overall goodness of fit of the estimated model variance-covariance matrix to the observed matrix.…”
Section: Cfamentioning
confidence: 99%