2009
DOI: 10.1039/b907277b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General and efficient simulation of pulse EPR spectra

Abstract: We present a rather general and efficient method of simulating electron-spin echo spectra for spin systems where the microwave frequency does not simultaneously excite EPR transitions that share a common level. The approach can handle arbitrary pulse sequences with microwave pulses of arbitrary length and strength. The signal is computed as a sum over signals from the electron coherence transfer pathways contributing to the detected echo. For each pathway, amplitudes and frequencies of the signal components ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
180
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Spectral processing of ESEEM patterns, including subtraction of the relaxation decay (fitting by polynomials of three to six degrees), apodization (Hamming window), zero filling, and fast Fourier transformation (FT), were performed using Bruker WIN-EPR version 2.22 revision 10. Processed data were then imported into Matlab R2010a via the EasySpin package 39 either to be simulated by EasySpin version 4.5.5 or to be analyzed by a homemade script for fitting data in (ν 1 ) 2 versus (ν 2 ) 2 coordinates. After the HYSCORE had been plotted as (ν 1 ) 2 versus (ν 2 ) 2 , ridges were fit via a linear regression with each point on the ridge weighted according to its HYSCORE intensity (see below).…”
Section: Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral processing of ESEEM patterns, including subtraction of the relaxation decay (fitting by polynomials of three to six degrees), apodization (Hamming window), zero filling, and fast Fourier transformation (FT), were performed using Bruker WIN-EPR version 2.22 revision 10. Processed data were then imported into Matlab R2010a via the EasySpin package 39 either to be simulated by EasySpin version 4.5.5 or to be analyzed by a homemade script for fitting data in (ν 1 ) 2 versus (ν 2 ) 2 coordinates. After the HYSCORE had been plotted as (ν 1 ) 2 versus (ν 2 ) 2 , ridges were fit via a linear regression with each point on the ridge weighted according to its HYSCORE intensity (see below).…”
Section: Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 _ENREF_24 To assign the resonances that were observed we next investigated the three selectively 13 C-labeled HMBPPs: spectra are shown in Figure 6B–D. The results of spectral simulations (Figures S5–S9) using EasySpin 26,27 yielded the hyperfine coupling tensors shown in SI Table S3: [1- 13 C], A ii = [−0.7, −0.9, 2.2] MHz; [2- 13 C], A ii = [0.5, 0.7, 4.9] MHz; [3- 13 C], A ii = [3.9, −0.3, −0.1] MHz. Clearly, all three hyperfine interactions are quite small, although those for the 2 and 3-positions (the double bond) are larger than for C-1, consistent again with a weak π-interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESR-2 is intended for most high-field ESR simulations (possibly involving relaxation, chemical kinetics and anisotropic couplings) and includes a complete basis set on all electrons and anisotropically coupled nuclei, but onlyÊ andT l0 for the isotropically coupled nuclei. This, when used together with the non-interacting subspace separation procedure (Section 2.10), is effectively a generalization of current wisdom about the state spaces encountered in high-field ESR dynamics [73].…”
Section: Standard Esr Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ESR-1 includes the complete state space for all electrons (which are pulsed and observed), but only the identity state andT l0 for the nuclei, taking into account the fact that, in simple pulsed ESR experiments at high field, the transverse nuclear states are never populated [73]. The MARY-1 basis set only includes the ''zero-quantum subspace'' -states with hŜ Z i ¼ 0, taking advantage of the corresponding conservation law.…”
Section: Conservation Law Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%