2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.103532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

General analytic predictions of two-field inflation and perturbative reheating

Abstract: The observational signatures of multi-field inflation will generally evolve as the Universe reheats. We introduce a general analytic formalism for tracking this evolution through perturbative reheating, applicable to two field models with arbitrary separable potentials. The various transitions, including the onset of scalar field oscillations and the reheating of each field, can happen in different orders and on arbitrary hypersurfaces. The effective equations of state of the oscillating fields are also arbitr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the predictions of Nflation [35][36][37], and hence may be considered as a special, twofield case of that scenario. It is also the same as the predictions of inflation driven by two quadratic fields which decay at the same time [9,33,38]. Finally, note that if one took an equal prior range for ϕ Ã and σ Ã then the inflating curvaton would be much more common than the standard curvaton scenario, since it can occur for a much larger range of initial σ Ã values.…”
Section: The Inflating Curvatonsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is in agreement with the predictions of Nflation [35][36][37], and hence may be considered as a special, twofield case of that scenario. It is also the same as the predictions of inflation driven by two quadratic fields which decay at the same time [9,33,38]. Finally, note that if one took an equal prior range for ϕ Ã and σ Ã then the inflating curvaton would be much more common than the standard curvaton scenario, since it can occur for a much larger range of initial σ Ã values.…”
Section: The Inflating Curvatonsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We denote N ad = min[N bg , N therm ], where N bg is the time by which super-Hubble coherence of the inflaton condensate is lost, indicated by φ rms > φ . Any significant turning of the system within the field space between the end of inflation and N ad could amplify non-Gaussianities and isocurvature perturbations, thereby threatening the close agreement between predictions in these models and measurements of the CMB [41][42][43][44]. In Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If their amplitude remains unaffected by the bounce physics, they can still be affected by the subsequent phase of (p)reheating, which can change not only the amplitude but also the sign of non-linearity parameters [439,440,480]. Thus, as highlighted above, a thorough understanding of preheating is essential for any comparison of predictions with current and forthcoming high-precision data.…”
Section: Spatial Curvature and Non-gaussianitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%