2002
DOI: 10.1089/108729002760220734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GeneBlocs Are Powerful Tools to Study and Delineate Signal Transduction Processes That Regulate Cell Growth and Transformation

Abstract: The study of signal transduction processes using antisense oligonucleotides is often complicated by low intracellular stability of the antisense reagents or by nonspecific effects that cause toxicity. Here, we introduce a new class of antisense molecules, so-called GeneBlocs, which are characterized by improved stability, high target RNA specificity, and low toxicity. GeneBlocs allow for efficient downregulation of mRNA expression at nanomolar concentrations, and they do not interfere with cell proliferation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This antisense RNA:DNA hybrid oligonucleotides recruit RNaseH to the Smad2 or Smad3 target mRNA, causing its degradation. Several lines of evidence have indicated already that this RNaseH-mediated antisense strategy is a valid and alternative approach for siRNA-mediated depletion of gene products (15,25). Moreover, we have validated some of our results obtained with GBs also with the siRNA-based approach and the same results were obtained using either tool, except for the effect of Smad2 depletion on MMP-9 gene induction by TGFβ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This antisense RNA:DNA hybrid oligonucleotides recruit RNaseH to the Smad2 or Smad3 target mRNA, causing its degradation. Several lines of evidence have indicated already that this RNaseH-mediated antisense strategy is a valid and alternative approach for siRNA-mediated depletion of gene products (15,25). Moreover, we have validated some of our results obtained with GBs also with the siRNA-based approach and the same results were obtained using either tool, except for the effect of Smad2 depletion on MMP-9 gene induction by TGFβ.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In our experiments with Nme cells, the most discernible responses to TGFβ began to occur 48 to 72 hours after treatment, but the changes in cell morphology could already be detected 24 hours after stimulation (data not shown). To carry out transient knockdown of Smads in Nme cells, modified single-stranded AS-ONs (called GBs) were used, which induce RNaseH-mediated degradation of target Smad transcripts (15). As a negative control in each experiment, cells were transfected with control oligonucleotides, which do not induce Smad mRNA degradation [mismatch (MM) control].…”
Section: Specific Knockdown Of Smad2 and Smad3 Using Gbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the conditions used the transfection efficiency was optimized to be at least 95% (Sternberger et al, 2002). Three different GB molecules (A, B, C) were selected for each target and further tested for efficacy in a dose-response experiment.…”
Section: Gb Treatment Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for an unbiased approach in such a comparative study is reflected by the observation that Smad2-and Smad3-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts exhibit disturbances in basal expression levels of target genes as well as in their basal proliferation rates compared to wild-type cells (Piek et al, 2001). In this report, we have therefore used improved antisense molecules, the so-called GeneBlocs (GBs) (Sternberger et al, 2002), to inhibit selectively expression of Smad2, Smad3 and Smad4 in parallel in two differentiationcompetent human cell lines, HaCaT keratinocytes and MCF-10A breast epithelial cells. Both are immortalized, nontransformed human cell lines that respond to TGF-b (Boukamp et al, 1988;Soule et al, 1990;Game et al, 1992;Basolo et al, 1994) and retain the capacity for further differentiation (Blaschke et al, 1994;Schoop et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%