1998
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.4.261-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Therapy Strategies for Tumor Antiangiogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25] These proteins are good candidates for gene delivery because they are produced physiologically, indicating that they are probably not immunogenic, and they are effective extracellularly, which circumvents the need to transduce all tumor cells. In particular, sFLT-1 is considered a decoy receptor able to bind and inactivate VEGF function, thus limiting its trophic effect on endothelium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] These proteins are good candidates for gene delivery because they are produced physiologically, indicating that they are probably not immunogenic, and they are effective extracellularly, which circumvents the need to transduce all tumor cells. In particular, sFLT-1 is considered a decoy receptor able to bind and inactivate VEGF function, thus limiting its trophic effect on endothelium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Angiostatic therapy appears to require long-term administration of the inhibitor to ensure tumor growth suppression in vivo. 1 Long-term systemic delivery of recombinant molecules is expensive, time-consuming for the patient, and may be insufficient to obtain high local concentrations of the therapeutic molecule in the tumor mass. The delivery of the molecule through a gene therapy approach could be a solution, as it would lead to constantly high local levels of the anti-angiogenic protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 While viral vectors are commonly used for gene transfer into skeletal muscle, naked DNA is now receiving considerable attention for gene transfer into muscle tissue, owing to its safety, simplicity and reliability. 4,6,7,13 However, as the transfection efficiency of naked DNA by intra-muscular injection is relatively low, this method would not suffice for the treatment of systemic diseases. In our study, ultrasound microbubblesmediated gene transfer allowed us to reduce the amount of naked DNA from 500 to 25 mg/mouse, confirming recent reports, which state that ultrasound microbubblesmediated gene transfer improves transfection efficiency and facilitates local gene expression in various tissues, such as cardiac muscle, 9 skeletal muscle, 14 carotid artery 15 and the fetus.…”
Section: Cancer Gene Therapy By Adrenomedullin Antagonistmentioning
confidence: 99%