2002
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200206000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Therapy in Orthopaedic Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
0
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…They have extremely high transduction efficiencies and can accommodate large cDNA fragments. 7 Cell transduction is feasible in most cell types, and thus adenovirus can be broadly used to transduce different tissues. The inability to integrate into the host genome ensures that transgene expression is transient, which is preferable for bone healing because continued gene expression following complete defect regeneration is unnecessary and possibly pathogenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have extremely high transduction efficiencies and can accommodate large cDNA fragments. 7 Cell transduction is feasible in most cell types, and thus adenovirus can be broadly used to transduce different tissues. The inability to integrate into the host genome ensures that transgene expression is transient, which is preferable for bone healing because continued gene expression following complete defect regeneration is unnecessary and possibly pathogenic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to nonviral vectors, viral vectors exhibit much greater transduction efficiency. 7 In an ex vivo gene therapy approach, cells are collected, transduced and cultured in vitro before in vivo implantation. 8 Although the majority of virus particles can be excluded before transplantation to avoid risk systemic infection, harvesting and culturing cells from patients may render this approach impractical for many applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10]40 The most powerful and easiest vector administration would be percutaneous in vivo injection of adenoviruses, but disadvantages, including lack of control over the target cell population and risks associated with direct viral inoculation, suggest development of other methods. rAAV has advantages over other viral and nonviral gene therapies, such as a lower potential of adverse events and higher efficiency, respectively, [18][19][20] but requires refinement for clinical usage as delivery systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant viral vectors are particularly effective. [8][9][10] However, combining viral vectors with biomaterials has not been fully explored. One of the most promising delivery methods incorporates viral vectors in a polymer matrix with release controlled by polymer degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Cell-based therapy: involves direct contribution to tissue regeneration, genetic modification of cells to act as vehicles for gene therapy and differentiation into various tissue types [18] .…”
Section: Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%