2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene silencing by CRISPR interference in mycobacteria

Abstract: Recombination-based tools for introducing targeted genomic mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis are not efficient due to higher rate of illegitimate recombination compared with homologous DNA exchange. Moreover, involvement of multiple steps and specialized reagents make these tools cost ineffective. Here we introduce a novel clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) interference (CRISPRi) approach that efficiently represses expression of target genes in mycobacteria. CRISPRi system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
204
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
204
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1B). This is consistent with the previous observation that sgRNAs farther from the 5= end of the transcription start site caused weaker repression (42). In the uppP null mutant, depleting bcrC led to xylose sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…1B). This is consistent with the previous observation that sgRNAs farther from the 5= end of the transcription start site caused weaker repression (42). In the uppP null mutant, depleting bcrC led to xylose sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In agreement with the previous study (42), employing an sgRNA targeting the template strand resulted in insignificant repression, as it was reported that the Cas9-sgRNA heteroduplex recognizes the PAM on the nontemplate DNA strand (40,52). These results corroborate well with previously reported CRISPRi-mediated transcriptional repression in E. coli (42) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (68), where significant levels of transcriptional repression were observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…4). The difference in the level of CCR relief between the two gene targets may be associated with either the biochemical mechanism of CCR or the targeting efficiency of dCas9, which is knowingly affected by the sgRNA secondary structure and the location of the sgRNA target sequence within the gene (42,68). Our results suggest the potential applicability of CRISPRi in manipulating or even optimizing complex and multigenic phenotypes in C. acetobutylicum for industrial purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand, CRISPRi provides excellent transcriptional control and is simple to implement in many organisms. The CRISPRdCas9 system has been applied to genome-scale transcriptional repression (35) and activation (35,36) for interrogation of gene function in human cell lines as well as to genetic and metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli (37,38), Corynebacterium glutamicum (39), and mycobacteria (40).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%