2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02259-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene signatures of circulating breast cancer cell models are a source of novel molecular determinants of metastasis and improve circulating tumor cell detection in patients

Abstract: Background Progression to stage IV disease remains the main cause of breast cancer-related deaths. Increasing knowledge on the hematogenous phase of metastasis is key for exploiting the entire window of opportunity to interfere with early dissemination and to achieve a more effective disease control. Recent evidence suggests that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) possess diverse adaptive mechanisms to survive in blood and eventually metastasize, encouraging research into CTC-directed therapies. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Jin et al [ 10 ] use the CytoSorter ® CTC capture system, and show 50% and >80% sensitivity in DCIS and stage I/II BrC. Fina et al report >78% CTC detection rates in early-stage breast cancers using an antigen-independent method [ 11 ], and 65% CTC detection rate using antigen-dependent (EpCAM, ERBB2, and EGFR expression) capture, followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) profiling of targeted gene panel [ 12 ]. These studies support the biological plausibility of CTC-based cancer screening approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Jin et al [ 10 ] use the CytoSorter ® CTC capture system, and show 50% and >80% sensitivity in DCIS and stage I/II BrC. Fina et al report >78% CTC detection rates in early-stage breast cancers using an antigen-independent method [ 11 ], and 65% CTC detection rate using antigen-dependent (EpCAM, ERBB2, and EGFR expression) capture, followed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) profiling of targeted gene panel [ 12 ]. These studies support the biological plausibility of CTC-based cancer screening approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prior attempts at evaluating CTCs for cancer screening were based on epitope capture using the CellSearch platform, which, while not approved for CTC detection, is frequently used in research. Several prior studies highlight the lower performance of epitope capture, arising due to its inability to efficiently harvest or detect CTCs with lower expression of EpCAM and PanCK, which are the most routinely employed target markers [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], with some improvements in sensitivity when epitope capture is used in combination with gene expression profiling [ 12 ]. We previously described a novel functional enrichment method with high CTC detection sensitivity, which yields sufficient CTCs for downstream applications, such as immunocytochemistry (ICC) profiling [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed a total of 378 research papers in the PubMed database from 2010 to mid-2022 and observed an increasing trend in the number of publications, with an annual growth rate of 12.25%. We summarized the recent studies on the association between CTCs and breast cancer metastasis in Table 1 [ 14 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBNA1BP2 functions as a dynamic scaffold for ribosome biogenesis (Hirano et al, 2009). FCF1 is a potential marker of circulating breast cancer cells for detecting metastasis (Fina et al, 2022). The nucleolar GTPbinding protein GNL2 is essential for retinal neurogenesis in developing zebrafish (Paridaen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%