2019
DOI: 10.1101/629816
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Sets Analysis using Network Patterns

Abstract: High throughput assays allow researchers to identify sets of genes related to experimental conditions or phenotypes of interest. These gene sets are frequently subjected to functional interpretation using databases of gene annotations. Recent approaches have extended this approach to also consider networks of genegene relationships and interactions when attempting to characterize properties of a gene set. We present here a supervised learning algorithm for gene set analysis, called 'GeneSet MAPR', that for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also speculated on a more iterative version of propagating information along network edges: once pathways have been scored for relevance to the query set of SNPs, perhaps the SNPs could be scored (also via RWR) for relevance to the top-ranking pathways, and by iterating pathway and SNP ranking multiple times we may identify a subset of the query set that is strongly connected with a subset of the pathways. Finally, in contrast to the ‘unsupervised’ approach adopted in VarSAn, future work may considering deploying supervised learning methods to characterize patterns of network connectivity that are predictive of membership in the query set, and infer pathway relevance scores from these patterns; such an approach was used for gene set characterization in recent work ( 79 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also speculated on a more iterative version of propagating information along network edges: once pathways have been scored for relevance to the query set of SNPs, perhaps the SNPs could be scored (also via RWR) for relevance to the top-ranking pathways, and by iterating pathway and SNP ranking multiple times we may identify a subset of the query set that is strongly connected with a subset of the pathways. Finally, in contrast to the ‘unsupervised’ approach adopted in VarSAn, future work may considering deploying supervised learning methods to characterize patterns of network connectivity that are predictive of membership in the query set, and infer pathway relevance scores from these patterns; such an approach was used for gene set characterization in recent work ( 79 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also speculated on a more iterative version of propagating information along network edges: once pathways have been scored for relevance to the query set of SNPs, perhaps the SNPs could be scored (also via RWR) for relevance to the top-ranking pathways, and by iterating pathway and SNP ranking multiple times we may identify a subset of the query set that is strongly connected with a subset of the pathways. Finally, in contrast to the “unsupervised” approach adopted in VarSAn, future work may considering deploying supervised learning methods to characterize patterns of network connectivity that are predictive of membership in the query set, and infer pathway relevance scores from these patterns; such an approach was used for gene set characterization in recent work (76).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KnowEnG pipeline uses an implementation called "DRaWR" [24], the main advantage of which compared to enrichment tests is that it examines not only properties with which the given genes are annotated but also the properties with which genes related to the given genes are annotated (Appendix C in S4 File). We have previously used DRaWR to characterize gene sets in Drosophila development [24] and cancer [63]. Here, we used the DRaWR-based knowledgeguided gene set characterization pipeline with the HumanNet Integrated network [39] as the underlying network to identify, for ESCC subtype-related genes, the most related pathways in the Enrichr Pathways Collection [64].…”
Section: Case Study 3: Signature Analysis and Gene Set Characterizatimentioning
confidence: 99%