2009
DOI: 10.1177/0962280209351908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene set enrichment analysis made simple

Abstract: Among the many applications of microarray technology, one of the most popular is the identification of genes that are differentially expressed in two conditions. A common statistical approach is to quantify the interest of each gene with a p-value, adjust these p-values for multiple comparisons, chose an appropriate cut-off, and create a list of candidate genes. This approach has been criticized for ignoring biological knowledge regarding how genes work together. Recently a series of methods, that do incorpora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
190
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
190
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Since genes are far from equiprobable in gene sets, the adequate null hypothesis for g versus v gives genes with probabilities proportional to their frequency in the gene set database 55 and requires the KS, T-, and W-tests with frequency-corrected null hypotheses (see refs. [56][57][58] for review). In addition, scoring the enrichment of the »1500 KEGG and GO gene sets in >1,000 samples would mean computing »1.5 million tests with a high accuracy for the most significant results.…”
Section: Sample Enrichment Scores (Ses)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Since genes are far from equiprobable in gene sets, the adequate null hypothesis for g versus v gives genes with probabilities proportional to their frequency in the gene set database 55 and requires the KS, T-, and W-tests with frequency-corrected null hypotheses (see refs. [56][57][58] for review). In addition, scoring the enrichment of the »1500 KEGG and GO gene sets in >1,000 samples would mean computing »1.5 million tests with a high accuracy for the most significant results.…”
Section: Sample Enrichment Scores (Ses)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we applied several Enrichment Analysis methods, such as "reporter features" from Patil et al [7], Wilcoxon rank-sum test [8], and globaltest from Goeman et al [9], and noticed a clear benefit from the increased gene coverage. Additionally, as most of the Gene Set Enrichment methods have a lower threshold on the number of genes in the set based on the underlying statistics [8], a number of sets had to be filtered out when microarray data processed with the original annotation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, as most of the Gene Set Enrichment methods have a lower threshold on the number of genes in the set based on the underlying statistics [8], a number of sets had to be filtered out when microarray data processed with the original annotation. The improved annotation, on the other hand, allowed to keep a fraction of these genes for the analysis, as in this case they satisfied the gene coverage requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GSEA method went a slight revision Subramanian et al [14], where ad-hoc modifications are implemented that are supposed to countervail the well-known lack of sensitivity of the KS test [15,16].…”
Section: Esmentioning
confidence: 99%