1985
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Flow in Natural Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
700
1
21

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,614 publications
(767 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
15
700
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Both studies gave an estimate of N e to be 2,000-6,000, approximately. (31,32). The estimates of N e m between An.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies gave an estimate of N e to be 2,000-6,000, approximately. (31,32). The estimates of N e m between An.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene :flow has the effect of homogenizing the genetic composition of a population and thus can be seen as a constraining evolutionary force (Slarkin, 1985), with an opposite effect to that of diversifying natural selection. Additionally, migration has two main effects: it reduces the between-group differences, and increases variances within demes (Konigsberg, 2000;Hamilton, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously shown (15,16), it depends on just three parameters: the local deme size N, the age of the expansion T, and the migration rate m between adjacent demes (see below). Note that the current methodology is drastically different from previous approaches, which attempted to estimate migration between sampled populations (22,23), because, instead, we estimate the average number of immigrants in sampled demes (15,16) without needing to sample the population of origin of these migrants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%