2020
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene flow as a simple cause for an excess of high‐frequency‐derived alleles

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The site frequency spectra estimated in populations G1 and T were U-shaped, indicating an excess of high-frequency derived alleles (Figure 2; population G2 was excluded because of too small a sample size), consistent with ongoing episodes of positive selection, mis-assignment of ancestral alleles or gene flow (Marchi & Excoffier 2020). Estimates of Tajima’s D were positive but close to zero in clusters T and G1 (T: D=0.309; G1: D=0.167), indicating a slight deficit of low frequency variants (Table 2; Supplementary Table 2), consistent with balancing selection or population contraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The site frequency spectra estimated in populations G1 and T were U-shaped, indicating an excess of high-frequency derived alleles (Figure 2; population G2 was excluded because of too small a sample size), consistent with ongoing episodes of positive selection, mis-assignment of ancestral alleles or gene flow (Marchi & Excoffier 2020). Estimates of Tajima’s D were positive but close to zero in clusters T and G1 (T: D=0.309; G1: D=0.167), indicating a slight deficit of low frequency variants (Table 2; Supplementary Table 2), consistent with balancing selection or population contraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Second, to explore population structure, we performed a PCA analysis of all datasets, followed by a k -means clustering (results in Table H in S1 Appendix ). We acknowledge the possibility that unsampled “ghost” demes can exist and could potentially result in U-shaped SFS [ 10 ], and that some cases of metapopulation dynamics results in MMC trees [ 41 , 42 ]. Assessing the presence of ghost demes from genetic data is challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many possible factors may result in such a pattern of variation. These include recent migration from non-sampled populations [ 10 ], population structure [ 11 ], misorientation of ancestral and derived alleles [ 12 ], biased gene conversion [ 13 ], recent positive selection at many targets across the genome [ 14 ], background selection [ 15 , 16 ], temporally-fluctuating selection [ 17 ], and various reproductive strategies [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many possible factors may result in such a pattern of variation. These include recent migration from non-sampled populations [ME20], population structure [LBL + 16], misorientation of ancestral and derived alleles [BD03], biased gene conversion [PATE18], recent positive selection at many targets across the genome [BWSH01], background selection [CGD18], [JCJ20], temporally-fluctuating selection [HSDB08], and various reproductive strategies [TL14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%