Abstract:Proton therapy for cancer is now in widespread use, and facilities for carbon ion therapy are showing great promise, but a more complete understanding of the mechanisms underlying particle radiation therapy is still needed in order to optimize treatment. Studies of gene expression, especially those using whole genome techniques, can provide insight into many of the questions still remaining, from the molecular mechanisms involved to predicting patient outcome. This review will summarize gene expression studies… Show more
“…Even though we also found several genes “unique” to a specific radiation type, it is likely that many of them would also respond to the other radiation types in a different experimental set-up (i.e. time-dose combination) due to the differences in RBE and\or gene expression kinetics, but what is already clear from our and other studies is that the magnitude of gene expression changes and the number of differentially expressed genes are consistently higher for high-LET particles ( 22 ). Some of the observed differences may be explained by the different nature of X-rays (photons) and heavy ions (particles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Radiobiological transcriptional studies can offer valuable insight in this regard, revealing the biological basis of the cellular response to different radiation types ( 21 , 22 ). Peripheral blood is an easily-accessible biological sample which allows minimally invasive testing.…”
Understanding the differences in biological response to photon and particle radiation is important for optimal exploitation of particle therapy for cancer patients, as well as for the adequate application of radiation protection measures for astronauts. To address this need, we compared the transcriptional profiles of isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells 8 h after exposure to 1 Gy of X-rays, carbon ions or iron ions with those of non-irradiated cells using microarray technology. All genes that were found differentially expressed in response to either radiation type were up-regulated and predominantly controlled by p53. Quantitative PCR of selected genes revealed a significantly higher up-regulation 24 h after exposure to heavy ions as compared to X-rays, indicating their prolonged activation. This coincided with increased residual DNA damage as evidenced by quantitative γH2AX foci analysis. Furthermore, despite the converging p53 signature between radiation types, specific gene sets related to the immune response were significantly enriched in up-regulated genes following irradiation with heavy ions. In addition, irradiation, and in particular exposure to carbon ions, promoted transcript variation. Differences in basal and iron ion exposure-induced expression of DNA repair genes allowed the identification of a donor with distinct DNA repair profile. This suggests that gene signatures may serve as a sensitive indicator of individual DNA damage repair capacity. In conclusion, we have shown that photon and particle irradiation induce similar transcriptional pathways, albeit with variable amplitude and timing, but also elicit radiation type-specific responses that may have implications for cancer progression and treatment
“…Even though we also found several genes “unique” to a specific radiation type, it is likely that many of them would also respond to the other radiation types in a different experimental set-up (i.e. time-dose combination) due to the differences in RBE and\or gene expression kinetics, but what is already clear from our and other studies is that the magnitude of gene expression changes and the number of differentially expressed genes are consistently higher for high-LET particles ( 22 ). Some of the observed differences may be explained by the different nature of X-rays (photons) and heavy ions (particles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Radiobiological transcriptional studies can offer valuable insight in this regard, revealing the biological basis of the cellular response to different radiation types ( 21 , 22 ). Peripheral blood is an easily-accessible biological sample which allows minimally invasive testing.…”
Understanding the differences in biological response to photon and particle radiation is important for optimal exploitation of particle therapy for cancer patients, as well as for the adequate application of radiation protection measures for astronauts. To address this need, we compared the transcriptional profiles of isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells 8 h after exposure to 1 Gy of X-rays, carbon ions or iron ions with those of non-irradiated cells using microarray technology. All genes that were found differentially expressed in response to either radiation type were up-regulated and predominantly controlled by p53. Quantitative PCR of selected genes revealed a significantly higher up-regulation 24 h after exposure to heavy ions as compared to X-rays, indicating their prolonged activation. This coincided with increased residual DNA damage as evidenced by quantitative γH2AX foci analysis. Furthermore, despite the converging p53 signature between radiation types, specific gene sets related to the immune response were significantly enriched in up-regulated genes following irradiation with heavy ions. In addition, irradiation, and in particular exposure to carbon ions, promoted transcript variation. Differences in basal and iron ion exposure-induced expression of DNA repair genes allowed the identification of a donor with distinct DNA repair profile. This suggests that gene signatures may serve as a sensitive indicator of individual DNA damage repair capacity. In conclusion, we have shown that photon and particle irradiation induce similar transcriptional pathways, albeit with variable amplitude and timing, but also elicit radiation type-specific responses that may have implications for cancer progression and treatment
“…Authors showed that results are strongly influenced by the type of cells, culture condition, dose, dose rate, fractionation, and other physical features (i.e., LET, RBE) [22]. S.A. Amundson et al published that proton irradiation compared to X or gamma irradiation increases gene expression level in both their number and strength of response [23]. In the case of rat C6 glioblastoma, similar to human glioblastomas grade IV, the significant decrease in proliferation was found at a dose of 5 Gy and 10 Gy of X-rays after 48 h of culture [24].…”
The goal of the presented study was to compare the proliferation of different U118 MG and U251 MG glioblastoma cell lines irradiated with proton beam or X-rays in dose range 0.5-10.0 Gy. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay was carried out to study changes in proliferation presented as nuclear division index (NDI). Preliminary results suggest that protons and X-rays influence GBM (glioblastoma multiforme) cellular proliferation differently. Therapeutically, a decrease in NDI values with the increase in both types of radiation dose was found only for U251 MG cell line, and thus can be classified as more radiosensitive than U118 MG cell line. Also for U251 MG GBM cell line, a therapeutic proton beam was more effective in inhibition of proliferation than X-rays. Genetic differences between GBMs are supposed to be involved in the increased radiosensitivity, which is planned to be studied further by gene expression analysis.
“…Transcriptional profiling corresponds to the genes induced at these different dose levels. In general, at low doses, the genes induced are involved in general metabolism (bioenergetics and biosynthetic functions) whereas high doses activate genes involved in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and apoptosis [ 182 , 183 ]. Even if these are not yet fully understood, they may well have a bearing on radioprotection and radiotherapeutic issues.…”
Until recently, radiation effects have been considered to be mainly due to nuclear DNA damage and their management by repair mechanisms. However, molecular biology studies reveal that the outcomes of exposures to ionizing radiation (IR) highly depend on activation and regulation through other molecular components of organelles that determine cell survival and proliferation capacities. As typical epigenetic-regulated organelles and central power stations of cells, mitochondria play an important pivotal role in those responses. They direct cellular metabolism, energy supply and homeostasis as well as radiation-induced signaling, cell death, and immunological responses. This review is focused on how energy, dose and quality of IR affect mitochondria-dependent epigenetic and functional control at the cellular and tissue level. Low-dose radiation effects on mitochondria appear to be associated with epigenetic and non-targeted effects involved in genomic instability and adaptive responses, whereas high-dose radiation effects (>1 Gy) concern therapeutic effects of radiation and long-term outcomes involving mitochondria-mediated innate and adaptive immune responses. Both effects depend on radiation quality. For example, the increased efficacy of high linear energy transfer particle radiotherapy, e.g., C-ion radiotherapy, relies on the reduction of anastasis, enhanced mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and immunogenic (antitumor) responses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.