2020
DOI: 10.1007/124_2020_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene Expression in Coffee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 253 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, the C. arabica genome exhibits little, if any, subgenome expression dominance, while individual genes demonstrate fine-scale expression partitioning by subgenome, as expected. Importantly, dominance was observed within specialized metabolic pathways contributing to coffee aromatic quality, consistent with earlier studies on these and other gene families 64-67 . These studies suggest that subgenome dominance, while averaging out equally in a global sense, follows a mosaic pattern in C. arabica wherein different sub-processes are locally dominated by each of the subgenomes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In conclusion, the C. arabica genome exhibits little, if any, subgenome expression dominance, while individual genes demonstrate fine-scale expression partitioning by subgenome, as expected. Importantly, dominance was observed within specialized metabolic pathways contributing to coffee aromatic quality, consistent with earlier studies on these and other gene families 64-67 . These studies suggest that subgenome dominance, while averaging out equally in a global sense, follows a mosaic pattern in C. arabica wherein different sub-processes are locally dominated by each of the subgenomes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Physiological studies on the relationship between drought tolerance and gene expression have led to the identification of more than 80 CGs in both C. canephora (Marraccini et al, 2011(Marraccini et al, , 2012Vieira et al, 2013;Vinecky et al, 2012) and C. arabica (Freire et al, 2013;Mofatto et al, 2016). Additional genes that are assumed to play a key role in plant responses to abiotic stress have also been identified (Marraccini, 2020), such as those involved in the ABA biosynthetic pathway (Costa, 2014;Cotta, 2017;Simkin et al, 2008), cell protection and detoxification (Hinniger et al, 2006;Santos & Mazzafera, 2012;Thioune et al, 2017Thioune et al, , 2020, and aquaporins biosynthesis (Miniussi et al, 2015;Santos & Mazzafera, 2013). Other genes are involved in carotenoid/phenylpropanoid (Lepelley et al, 2012;Simkin et al, 2010), caffeine (Denoeud et al, 2014) and sugar (Geromel et al, 2006;Privat et al, 2008) biosynthetic pathways, or they encode transcription factors (Alves, 2015;Alves et al, 2017Alves et al, , 2018Thioune et al, 2017Thioune et al, , 2020Torres et al, 2019).…”
Section: Climate Change Is Predicted To Have Marked Negative Impacts Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bean biochemical composition (and their associated cup quality) variation observed in shaded vs. FS cultivated coffee plants has been attributed to greater expression of genes involved in important metabolic pathways (de Castro and Marraccini, 2006;Cheng et al, 2020). For example, the elevated sucrose level observed in lower canopy (LC) beans compared to the upper canopy (UC) beans is likely the result of increased expression of a battery of genes (such as SPS1, SPS2.2, SUS2.1, CIN, VIN1, and VINI.2), previously reported to play a key role in coffee bean sugar metabolism (Geromel et al, 2006;Privat et al, 2008;Joët et al, 2009;Marraccini, 2020). Another example of this is the elevated expression of RD22 (a gene involved in plant responses to stress as reported by Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 1993) in beans from LC compared to UC, suggesting that the continued bean growth until the red stage in LC was facilitated by a stronger dehydration resistance and less chlorophyll degradation.…”
Section: Shade Effects On Coffee Bean Biochemical Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%