2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1671-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene expression analysis of skin grafts and cultured keratinocytes using synthetic RNA normalization reveals insights into differentiation and growth control

Abstract: BackgroundKeratinocytes (KCs) are the most frequent cells in the epidermis, and they are often isolated and cultured in vitro to study the molecular biology of the skin. Cultured primary cells and various immortalized cells have been frequently used as skin models but their comparability to intact skin has been questioned. Moreover, when analyzing KC transcriptomes, fluctuation of polyA+ RNA content during the KCs’ lifecycle has been omitted.ResultsWe performed STRT RNA sequencing on 10 ng samples of total RNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain genes, such as LOR (a skin development gene), were upregulated only in SC1, in agreement with research that classifies positive LOR expression as a key developmental marker of healthy skin . In comparison to another cultured keratinocyte‐only HSE model, SC1 had several overlapping genes (including KRT71 , and several similar gene classes between both datasets including C#orf# genes, TRIM# , and LOC# genes), but numerous others which were not mentioned in that analysis . It would be difficult to directly compare these models, as many components are different: SC1 is a 3D HSE with a dermis composed of a silk‐collagen hydrogel material, and also contains dermal fibroblasts, which could influence the RNASeq results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Certain genes, such as LOR (a skin development gene), were upregulated only in SC1, in agreement with research that classifies positive LOR expression as a key developmental marker of healthy skin . In comparison to another cultured keratinocyte‐only HSE model, SC1 had several overlapping genes (including KRT71 , and several similar gene classes between both datasets including C#orf# genes, TRIM# , and LOC# genes), but numerous others which were not mentioned in that analysis . It would be difficult to directly compare these models, as many components are different: SC1 is a 3D HSE with a dermis composed of a silk‐collagen hydrogel material, and also contains dermal fibroblasts, which could influence the RNASeq results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Cells were then filtered based on different quality parameters calculated for each dataset (Supplementary Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2) Additionally, the output of TraCeR (Stubbington et al 2016) was used to remove cells without a detected TCR sequence, as well as iNKT and γ ∂ T cells (defined as cells with at least one γ and one ∂ chain detected and no αβ pair). Two mouse steady-state skin Treg from the Mouse Melanoma dataset were also removed from posterior analysis because, even though they had reconstructed TCR and expression of expected T cell genes, they also presented transcripts expected to appear in other cell types, possibly keratinocytes or Langerhans cells (Katayama et al 2015;Heng, Painter, and Immunological Genome Project Consortium 2008) (Supplementary Figure 16D).…”
Section: Scrna-seq Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected samples from the psoriatic lesional and non-lesional skin from patients and healthy skin from controls. We also employed data normalization with synthetic spike-in RNA, which enables more accurate comparison of gene expression in heterogeneous samples where total mRNA levels per cell may be highly different 10 11 12 . Our results show the power of RNAseq over the microarray studies, providing a more comprehensive view of altered signaling pathways both in non-lesional and lesional psoriatic skin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%