2010
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene–environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches

Abstract: Despite the yield of recent genome-wide association (GWA) studies, the identified variants explain only a small proportion of the heritability of most complex diseases. This unexplained heritability could be partly due to gene-environment (G×E) interactions or more complex pathways involving multiple genes and exposures. This article provides a tutorial on the available epidemiological designs and statistical analysis approaches for studying specific G×E interactions and choosing the most appropriate methods. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
616
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 607 publications
(646 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
5
616
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A tutorial on the current study designs for mapping G×E interactions is provided by Duncan Thomas (Gene -environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 11, 259-272 (2010)) 1 . Some 2 have argued that G×E interactions will contribute little to the missing heritability 3 if G×E effects are small or if correlations between gene and environment (rGE) mask genotype-by-genotype (G×G) effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tutorial on the current study designs for mapping G×E interactions is provided by Duncan Thomas (Gene -environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches. Nature Reviews Genetics 11, 259-272 (2010)) 1 . Some 2 have argued that G×E interactions will contribute little to the missing heritability 3 if G×E effects are small or if correlations between gene and environment (rGE) mask genotype-by-genotype (G×G) effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Race, ethnicity and ancestral categories falsely suggest genetic homogeneity within and heterogenity between groups; they ignore the genetic variability within groups, gene-environment interactions [13] and differences due to socially mediated mechanisms. Therefore, many scientists advocate abolishing such categorisation in research [4], versus those who believe there is still a role for the continued use of self-identified race and ethnicity in biomedical and genetic research [14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To unearth the 85 to 90% of CCD risk that is not explained by current analyses of GWAS data sets, it will be important to address contexts defined by macro-and microenvironmental factors (20). Macroenvironmental factors-mainly those that affect the individual through exposure to toxins, food intake, and other life-style factors-vary over time and alter the microenvironments within distinct tissues and cell types (Fig.…”
Section: Defining Inherited Risk Dependent On Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%