2021
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene editing and modulation for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This therapeutic regimen maintains muscle strength and extends life expectancy, but corticosteroids long-term use could cause severe and very debilitating side effects (i.e., weight gain, glucose intolerance, hypertension, and depression) [ 41 , 42 ], thus making necessary the identification of an alternative and less toxic approach. Recently, the most intriguing therapeutical proposals are represented by stop-codon read-through therapy, gene replacement approaches, myoblast transfer therapy, and also drug-related inhibition of resident macrophages [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. We suggest CB2 receptor agonism as an alternative, effective, and safe anti-inflammatory target for the therapy of DMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This therapeutic regimen maintains muscle strength and extends life expectancy, but corticosteroids long-term use could cause severe and very debilitating side effects (i.e., weight gain, glucose intolerance, hypertension, and depression) [ 41 , 42 ], thus making necessary the identification of an alternative and less toxic approach. Recently, the most intriguing therapeutical proposals are represented by stop-codon read-through therapy, gene replacement approaches, myoblast transfer therapy, and also drug-related inhibition of resident macrophages [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. We suggest CB2 receptor agonism as an alternative, effective, and safe anti-inflammatory target for the therapy of DMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 , 31 We also note that PPMO approaches are likely to be safer than somatic gene editing approaches, which carry risk of significant off-target effects. 32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, gene editing has moved to the forefront with the identification of mechanisms of DNA repair ( Stephenson and Flanigan, 2021 ). The CRISPR-Cas system has made it possible for research labs all around the world to successfully incorporate gene editing into their work ( Jinek et al, 2012 ; Mali et al, 2013 ; Perez-Pinera et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Therapeutic Strategies For Dmdmentioning
confidence: 99%