2016
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
313
3
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 407 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
313
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work, we demonstrated that GM pigs that lack CD163 expression on macrophages fail to support the replication of a single type 2 PRRSV isolate (16). In the present study, we demonstrated that macrophages from KO pigs were resistant to infection with a large panel of type 1 and type 2 isolates ( Table 2), suggesting that all PRRSV isolates, regardless of genotype or clade, require CD163.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous work, we demonstrated that GM pigs that lack CD163 expression on macrophages fail to support the replication of a single type 2 PRRSV isolate (16). In the present study, we demonstrated that macrophages from KO pigs were resistant to infection with a large panel of type 1 and type 2 isolates ( Table 2), suggesting that all PRRSV isolates, regardless of genotype or clade, require CD163.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Recently, we showed that GM pigs lacking CD163 expression on macrophages failed to support infection with a type 2 virus (16). The purpose of the current study was to determine if CD163 knockout (KO) pigs were resistant to type 1 PRRSV genotype viruses and, second, to determine if the replacement of SRCR 5 with an hCD163L1 peptide sequence would be sufficient to confer on pigs resistance to both type 1 and type 2 viruses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one study showed that Sn gene knockout pigs were infected by PRRSV as usual (49), and a recent study using geneedited pigs demonstrates the indispensability of pCD163 (28). Therefore, pCD163 is a core receptor for PRRSV infection and requires more in-depth research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising first use of gene editing in the dairy industry to address welfare issues may be the production of hornless dairy cattle with the introduction of the POLLED allele, which is nearly fixed in some beef breeds but low in frequency in Holsteins (Carlson et al, 2016). Other animal agriculture species are also making headway in the production of edited species, including pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus that are now being produced (Whitworth et al, 2016). Advances in the understanding of the influence of various genes and genomic variants on phenotypes will bring forth many future opportunities for the improvement of quantitative traits through gene editing.…”
Section: Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%