2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene delivery to cone photoreceptors by subretinal injection of rAAV2/6 in the mouse retina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is difficult to compare the effective doses from different experiments, this dose between 4 × 10 7 and 4 × 10 8 GC/eye for mice is relatively low, since the effective dose for subretinal injection in mice is typically 1 × 10 8 to 1 × 10 10 GC/eye. 44 , 45 , 46 In this study, AAV8-aflibercept at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye performed worse than AAV8-nVEGFi at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye in reducing CNV areas (63.8% vs. 78.3%, p < 0.05), and it appeared that even AAV8-aflibercept at 4 × 10 9 GC/eye performed worse than AAV8-nVEGFi at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye (67.8% vs. 78.3%), even if the difference was not statistically significant. This is consistent with the expression results in vivo , where the expression of VEGF Trap in AAV8-aflibercept at 4 × 10 9 GC/eye was much lower than that in AAV8-nVEGFi at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye (1,309 ± 695.6 vs. 3,503 ± 856.9 ng/eye).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult to compare the effective doses from different experiments, this dose between 4 × 10 7 and 4 × 10 8 GC/eye for mice is relatively low, since the effective dose for subretinal injection in mice is typically 1 × 10 8 to 1 × 10 10 GC/eye. 44 , 45 , 46 In this study, AAV8-aflibercept at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye performed worse than AAV8-nVEGFi at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye in reducing CNV areas (63.8% vs. 78.3%, p < 0.05), and it appeared that even AAV8-aflibercept at 4 × 10 9 GC/eye performed worse than AAV8-nVEGFi at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye (67.8% vs. 78.3%), even if the difference was not statistically significant. This is consistent with the expression results in vivo , where the expression of VEGF Trap in AAV8-aflibercept at 4 × 10 9 GC/eye was much lower than that in AAV8-nVEGFi at 4 × 10 8 GC/eye (1,309 ± 695.6 vs. 3,503 ± 856.9 ng/eye).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sterile injection was performed according to a previously described method [33][34][35]. In brief, mice were abdominally injected with 1% pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg), and tropicamide (0.5%) was dropped on the eyes.…”
Section: Subretinal Injection Of Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%