2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001220100568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene content and organization of the oat mitochondrial genome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, Bowtie2 software with the–al-conc flag 33 was applied to map sequence reads to the reference organelle genomes and to extract those mapped sequence reads into a separate FASTQ file. There are no oat organelle genomes sequenced and reported so far 34 . In this analysis, wheat cp genome sequences (GenBank accession: AB042240) 35 and wheat mt genome sequences (GenBank accession: AP008982) 36 were used as reference genomes, as wheat is the most closely related grass species with both cp and mt genome sequences published.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Bowtie2 software with the–al-conc flag 33 was applied to map sequence reads to the reference organelle genomes and to extract those mapped sequence reads into a separate FASTQ file. There are no oat organelle genomes sequenced and reported so far 34 . In this analysis, wheat cp genome sequences (GenBank accession: AB042240) 35 and wheat mt genome sequences (GenBank accession: AP008982) 36 were used as reference genomes, as wheat is the most closely related grass species with both cp and mt genome sequences published.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main chromosome has two pairs of large direct repeats, both active in recombination leading to near equimolar levels of the reference and recombinant genome conformations (Figure 6). This pattern of recombinational equimolarity appears to be the rule for large recombining repeats that have been investigated semiquantitatively in other angiosperm mitochondrial genomes (Palmer and Shields, 1984;Palmer and Herbon, 1986;Stern and Palmer, 1986;Lejeune et al, 1987;Siculella and Palmer, 1988;Folkerts and Hanson, 1989;Coulthart et al, 1990;Siculella et al, 2001;Sloan et al, 2010). By contrast, the 3.6-kb direct repeat on the small cucumber chromosomes occupies a distinctly different recombinational equilibrium, with the split conformation outnumbering the integrated conformation by 9:1 (Figures 5 and 6).…”
Section: Differential Recombinational Equilibria Of Large Repeatsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this case, recombination at one of the direct repeats will simultaneously increase the frequency of the recombinant conformation for itself along with the reference conformation for the other direct repeat (Figure 7), leading to a state of apparent recombinational equimolarity for both pairs of repeats (Figure 7), as seen in the main cucumber chromosome (Figure 6). If correct, this model appears to be specific to this genome because those examined plant mitochondrial genomes which, in their entirety, are analogous to the two smaller cucumber chromosomes in containing but a single pair of large recombining direct repeats (many of them no larger than the 3.6-kb cucumber repeat) appear to be at or near recombinational equimolarity (Palmer and Shields, 1984;Palmer and Herbon, 1986;Stern and Palmer, 1986;Siculella and Palmer, 1988;Siculella et al, 2001). …”
Section: Differential Recombinational Equilibria Of Large Repeatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These not only include the nucleus and chloroplast genomes of the host species itself, but may also include sequences derived from the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of other species [ 3 ]. Much of this sequence is large (>1 kb) and repetitive in nature [ 25 ], providing sufficient tracts of homology to promote the highly dynamic recombination evident in plant mitochondrial genomes [ 25 27 ]. Indeed, it is the high rates of sequence acquisition/loss and recombination that give plant mitochondrial genomes their reputation for rapid intergenic evolution, leading to low levels of non-genic homology among even closely related species [ 2 , 8 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%