2012
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences

Abstract: The Prodigal software is freely available under the General Public License from http://code.google.com/p/prodigal/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
385
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 483 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
385
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed a clear switch in the optimal translation and annotation strategies at about 250 bp: metagenomes shorter than this benefitted from 6FT and per-read annotation, while metagenomes longer than this benefitted from Prodigal and per-ORF annotation (Fig 3A). We speculate these results are likely explained by (i) metagenomic gene-finders are less accurate for short-reads than for long-reads (26) and (ii) short reads usually only contain a single true ORF while long-reads are more likely to span multiple ORFs.…”
Section: Annotating Multiple Orfs Per Read Is Necessary With Longer Rmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We observed a clear switch in the optimal translation and annotation strategies at about 250 bp: metagenomes shorter than this benefitted from 6FT and per-read annotation, while metagenomes longer than this benefitted from Prodigal and per-ORF annotation (Fig 3A). We speculate these results are likely explained by (i) metagenomic gene-finders are less accurate for short-reads than for long-reads (26) and (ii) short reads usually only contain a single true ORF while long-reads are more likely to span multiple ORFs.…”
Section: Annotating Multiple Orfs Per Read Is Necessary With Longer Rmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While 6FT captures all true open reading frames (ORFs), it also increases the volume of query sequences and can lead to classification of spurious ORFs. Alternatively, ab initio metagenomic gene prediction [26], [27], [28] decreases the volume of queries, but can result in false-positive and false-negative reading frame predictions Metagenomic simulation framework. 1) Taxonomic profiles from real metagenomes are used to construct mock microbial communities.…”
Section: Ab Initio Gene Prediction Reduces Data Volume At a Small Cosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All scaffolds ≥5 kb (≥1 kb for subassemblies, Methanohalophilus-1, and the GB enrichment culture) were included when binning genomes from the metagenomic assembly. Scaffolds were annotated as described previously 36,37 by predicting open reading frames using MetaProdigal 39 . Sequences were compared using USEARCH 40 to KEGG, UniRef90 and InterproScan 41 with single and reverse best hit (RBH) matches greater than 60 bits reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%