1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90275-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gene amplification in methotrexate-resistant mouse cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those studies have shown, (with one exception, ref. 25) that the amplified sequences were highly variable from one drug resistant cell line to another, with only a srr~all percentage of restriction fragments commonly amplified (22,23,40). Our results with the N-myc amplification units in neuroblastoma tumors were clearly different from most of the drug resistance genes studies because the majority of amplified restriction fragments identified were present in all eight neuroblastoma lines examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those studies have shown, (with one exception, ref. 25) that the amplified sequences were highly variable from one drug resistant cell line to another, with only a srr~all percentage of restriction fragments commonly amplified (22,23,40). Our results with the N-myc amplification units in neuroblastoma tumors were clearly different from most of the drug resistance genes studies because the majority of amplified restriction fragments identified were present in all eight neuroblastoma lines examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DM and HSR also occur in drug resistant cell lines. In such cases, it has been shown that the genes conferring drug resistance are amplified within a large domain of DNA that includes 100 to 1000 kilobases (kb) of sequences flanking the drug resistance genes themselves (22)(23)(24)(25)(26). The amplified gene and coamplified flanking sequences form the amplification unit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally reported by Biedler and Spengler (10) to be present in antifolate-resistant Chinese hamster lung cells overproducing dihydrofolate reductase, as well as in cells of two different neuroblastoma lines, SK-N-BE(2) and IMR-32, HSRs have since been demonstrated by hybridization in situ to contain amplified copies of (i) the DHFR gene in antifolate-resistant mouse and Chinese hamster cells (11,12); (ii) DNA sequences that encode mRNA species whose function is not yet known in the mouse adrenocortoid tumor cell line Y-1 (13); and (iii) the c-myc gene in the neuroendocrine tumor cell line COLO 320 (14). Similarly, a large body of evidence now exists which suggests that DMs contain amplified DNA (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), although direct demonstration by hybridization in situ has not been possible due to their small size and random nonchromosomal location. Indeed, it is most likely that HSRs and DMs are alternate cytological manifestations of the same phenomenon-i.e., the somatic cell amplification of genomic DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other processes shown to be altered by local mutation over a large fraction of the genome are sporulation in Bacillus subtilis (38), penicillin production by Aspergillus nidulans (39) and the development of the several organs in Drosophila melanogaster (40). In addition, extensive DNA rearrangement is found after exposure to MTX, and the DNA sequences seem to differ in each cell line (30). They include nondihydrofolate reductase as well as dihydrofolate reductase sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects as myeloid suppression, gastrointestinal symptoms, hepatotoxicity, alopecia, and osteopathy might be perpetuated in chronic form long after drug administration as a result of subnormal performance of heritably damaged cells. The well-known occurrence of chromosome aberrations in MTX-treated cells (14,30) might explain the occurrence of lymphoma in rheumatoid arthritis after low dose treatment with MTX (31). The damage produced in culture by MTX is proportional to the growth rate of cells at the time of exposure to the drug (ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%