NIPING at comparative psychology may be said to have started some 20 years ago in two frequently cited papers by Beach (1950) and Lorenz (19SO), It has continued sporadically but unabated ever since (e.g., Breland & Breland, 1961;Hodos & Campbell, 1969;Thorpe, 1961) to culminate in what appears to be the tragic death of comparative psychology reported by Lockard (1971). What are the circumstances surrounding the reported demise? Lockard spelled out in some detail what appears to be the agonizing end, but before any funeral is organized, there may be time to change the diagnosis. It makes sense, at least, to suggest that the symptoms characterize birth pangs rather than death throes.By way of definition, Schneirla (1966) has said, for example, that:Comparative psychology studies similarities and differences in the environmental adjustments and behavioral organization of animals on all phyletic levels, as well as individual abilities and behavioral integrations within groups [p. 283].