2006
DOI: 10.1353/dem.2006.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries

Abstract: It has been argued that a society's gender system may influence parents' sex preferences for children. If this is true, one should expect to find no evidence of such preferences in countries with a high level of gender equality. In this article, we exploit data from population registers from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden to examine continuities and changes in parental sex preferences in the Nordic countries during the past three to four decades. First, we do not observe an effect of the sex of the first… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
115
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
23
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While recent research on developed countries has used indirect behavioral measures to assess gender preference. such as the effect of sex of previous children on (intentions of) having another child (Brockmann 2001;Andersson et al 2006;Hank and Kohler 2000;Hank and Kohler 2003;Pollard and Morgan 2002), I consider asking direct questions for their preference to be appropriate for the purposes of this study. Because the odds of wanting/having a third or even a second child are low due to social and economic constraints in very low fertility contexts, it is likely that a desire for an additional child in response to gender preference may not be translated into actual behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While recent research on developed countries has used indirect behavioral measures to assess gender preference. such as the effect of sex of previous children on (intentions of) having another child (Brockmann 2001;Andersson et al 2006;Hank and Kohler 2000;Hank and Kohler 2003;Pollard and Morgan 2002), I consider asking direct questions for their preference to be appropriate for the purposes of this study. Because the odds of wanting/having a third or even a second child are low due to social and economic constraints in very low fertility contexts, it is likely that a desire for an additional child in response to gender preference may not be translated into actual behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further test this gender equality argument, Andersson et al (2006) replicated Pollard and Morgan's work in Scandinavian contexts using population registrars from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Although the authors expected parental gender indifference in these countries for their high level of gender equality, they did not find any evidence for parental gender indifference but rather a clear preference for one child of each sex to this date.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives In Understanding Daughter Preferencmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different parity progression ratios based on sex composition of children are found in developed countries (e.g., Andersson et al 2006;Kolk and Schnettler 2013). This approach is used in ongoing work examining intergenerational transmission of fertility (Cools and Hart 2014).…”
Section: Research Design Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, a preference for having at least one boy will increase fertility in settings with generally low or moderate fertility and where the alternatives to achieving such a goalsex-specific abortion or excess female mortality-are deemed unacceptable. However, sex preferences are typically weak in rich countries outside Asia (Andersson et al 2006). Also, the "insurance effect," "replacement effect," and other effects of mortality on fertility that are important in many parts of the world have little relevance in more-developed countries, given their very low infant and child mortality.…”
Section: Fecundity and Partnershipmentioning
confidence: 99%