2021
DOI: 10.1177/10778012211012096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered Responses to Gendered Harms: Sexual Violence and Bystander Intervention at Australian Music Festivals

Abstract: Bystander intervention has shown promise in preventing sexual violence in certain social contexts. Despite emerging evidence of pervasive sexual violence at music festivals, no research has considered bystander intervention in this setting. Drawing on an online survey conducted with 371 Australian festival attendees, we explore the role of gender on bystander intervention at music festivals. Findings point to significant gender differences, with women more willing and likely to intervene in a broader range of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By circumscribing men's caring practices, ideals of masculine autonomy may limit important opportunities to prevent or mitigate harms as they emerge on a night out. Such understandings may help explain, for example, why men report lower levels of awareness, responsibility and intervention in instances of sexual assault and violence in drinking contexts when compared to women (see, e.g., Baillie et al, 2021). Our analysis thus complicates the kinds of causality advocated in contemporary alcohol and other drug policy and research (Manton & Moore, 2016); rather than reify alcohol-related harms as a failing of the individual, or as an unavoidable by-product of men's drinking, we suggest that men's lack of care and collective responsibility may be a key force in harmful consumption events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By circumscribing men's caring practices, ideals of masculine autonomy may limit important opportunities to prevent or mitigate harms as they emerge on a night out. Such understandings may help explain, for example, why men report lower levels of awareness, responsibility and intervention in instances of sexual assault and violence in drinking contexts when compared to women (see, e.g., Baillie et al, 2021). Our analysis thus complicates the kinds of causality advocated in contemporary alcohol and other drug policy and research (Manton & Moore, 2016); rather than reify alcohol-related harms as a failing of the individual, or as an unavoidable by-product of men's drinking, we suggest that men's lack of care and collective responsibility may be a key force in harmful consumption events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, alcohol is the most commonly detected substance in drug‐facilitated sexual assaults [2]. Discussing the role of alcohol and other drugs in sexual assault can be controversial, because it is often used to excuse perpetrator behaviour and delegitimise victim experiences [3]. We reaffirm that sexual assault is never the victim's fault and that the responsibility for assault lies solely with the perpetrator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Findings demonstrate that some factors appear to be consistent in predicting bystander intervention, while others remain inconsistent. For instance, the seriousness of the situation can affect the likelihood of bystander intervention ( Baillie et al, 2022 ; Fischer et al, 2006 ; Pugh et al, 2016 ; Yule & Grych, 2017 ). If it is not clear whether or not consent was given ( Brady & Lowe, 2020 ; Brady et al, 2018 ), or it is not clear what the relationship between the people are ( Banyard & Moynihan, 2011 ; Burn, 2009 ), a potential bystander may not see the situation as serious enough to intervene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%