2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2004.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered political socialization in four contexts: political interest and values among junior high school students in China, Japan, Mexico, and the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Political socialization is defined as processes through which individuals in a society shape their beliefs, attitudes, motivations, values, and patterns of behaviors that relate to the realm of political world with all its aspects and issues (e.g., Dawson, Prewitt, & Dawson, 1977;Greenberg, 1970Greenberg, , 2009Mayer & Schmidt, 2004). The political socialization of children and youth has been thoroughly researched, and it is almost universally agreed that pre-teenage and adolescents children are affected by different agents of political socialization such as parents, teachers, mass media, or friends (e.g., Banks & Roker, 1994;Greenstein, 2009;Hess, & Torney, 2005;Ichilov, 1988;Priest et al, 2014;Sweeney & Zandan, 1981).…”
Section: Political Socialization In An Intractable Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political socialization is defined as processes through which individuals in a society shape their beliefs, attitudes, motivations, values, and patterns of behaviors that relate to the realm of political world with all its aspects and issues (e.g., Dawson, Prewitt, & Dawson, 1977;Greenberg, 1970Greenberg, , 2009Mayer & Schmidt, 2004). The political socialization of children and youth has been thoroughly researched, and it is almost universally agreed that pre-teenage and adolescents children are affected by different agents of political socialization such as parents, teachers, mass media, or friends (e.g., Banks & Roker, 1994;Greenstein, 2009;Hess, & Torney, 2005;Ichilov, 1988;Priest et al, 2014;Sweeney & Zandan, 1981).…”
Section: Political Socialization In An Intractable Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jaspers et al (2008) find that mothers are more successful in influencing their children's attitudes than fathers. Mayer and Schmidt (2004) notice that the mother is the only reliable predictor for political socialisation in Japan, which has been explained by the higher frequency of interaction between mothers and their children (Bao et al, 1999). Work by Zuckerman et al (2007) reveals that although women tend to be viewed as less politically involved, mothers stand at the centre of the household and matter more than fathers with regard to their offspring's partisanship in Britain and Germany.…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why then do women who are committed socially not increase their perception of having leader competences as do women engaged in politics? Maybe the answer lies in the intrinsic nature of these activities as well as the stereotyping that persists which implies that politics is a male-dominated sphere (Mayer & Schmidt, 2004) as are the leadership competences that follow. The gender role influences the perception of oneself, demonstrating that self-concepts tend to be gender-stereotypical (Cross & Madson, 1997;Spence & Buckner, 2000): fewer women than men perceive that they are competent to manage others and tend to build 'equal relationships' (see communal/feminine -versus agentic/male qualities: Eagly, 1987;Eagly & Karau, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%