2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4131984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gendered Impacts of Index-Insurance on Food-Consumption: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sub-Saharan Africa provides strong evidence that fintech companies can significantly close the gender gap in access to and use of financial services (Yeyouomo et al, 2023). Data on pastoralist household food consumption in southern Ethiopia show that index insurance can provide financial inclusion and resilience against climate change for poor female farmers in developing countries (Timu et al, 2023). The significant increase in women's acceptance of digital finance in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic (Budi et al, 2023) proves that fintech not only improves financial inclusion for women, but also improves women's voice in family decision-making.…”
Section: Fintech Application and Female Financial Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sub-Saharan Africa provides strong evidence that fintech companies can significantly close the gender gap in access to and use of financial services (Yeyouomo et al, 2023). Data on pastoralist household food consumption in southern Ethiopia show that index insurance can provide financial inclusion and resilience against climate change for poor female farmers in developing countries (Timu et al, 2023). The significant increase in women's acceptance of digital finance in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic (Budi et al, 2023) proves that fintech not only improves financial inclusion for women, but also improves women's voice in family decision-making.…”
Section: Fintech Application and Female Financial Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-subject designs generate more data per participant, thus providing more control over potentially unobservable individual-specific factors that may influence valuation (Gustafson, Lybbert, and Sumner 2016a). Within-subject designs also permit the analysis of changes in behavior in response to a stimulus, such as exposure to information, facilitating examination of updating behavior (Lybbert et al 2007;Gustafson, Lybbert, and Sumner 2016b;Timu et al 2018;Meerza and Gustafson 2019). Further, the use of within-subject designs eliminates potential failure of randomization to treatment and control conditions that can lead to failure of between-subject experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies evaluate the welfare impacts of agricultural insurance at the household level2017;Janzen and Carter 2019;Hill et al 2019; Timu et al 2021 among others). Few of these studies recognize the heterogenous nature of the target population and only one(Timu et al 2021) evaluates the differential welfare impacts by the gender of the household head. The consensus of these heterogenous welfare assessments is that agricultural insurance has the potential of helping the poor and women-headed households in managing climate related production risks via increased agricultural productivity, incomes, food consumption and asset accumulation.On the other hand, insurance can have negative intended and unintended consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%